3

The Talmud says:

Mishnah: A Nazirite vow of unspecified duration [remains in force] thirty days. Gemara: From where is this rule derived? Rabbi Mattena said: The text reads: He shall be [yihyeh] holy, and the numerical value of the word "yihyeh" is thirty. [Nazir 5a]

I thought we were not allowed to derive halacha from gematria. Are we?

(As an aside, wouldn't the gematria of "holy" be more appropriate?)

user15464
  • 11,447
  • 26
  • 103
Maurice Mizrahi
  • 21,770
  • 3
  • 15
  • 57
  • 2
    https://judaism.stackexchange.com/q/11553/759 – Double AA Oct 31 '18 at 15:34
  • @DoubleAA -- Yes, There are other examples. But I am looking for a statement, "No, we may not derive halacha from gematria". (Gematria is only a mnemonic device.) Is there such a thing? – Maurice Mizrahi Oct 31 '18 at 16:28
  • Consider https://judaism.stackexchange.com/q/44758/759 – Double AA Oct 31 '18 at 16:31
  • @DoubleAA -- Is there a statement anywhere that an asmakhta is a known and applied oral law from long, long ago, but whose derivation from Torah has been lost, so the gematria is used just as a mnemonic, not a proof? – Maurice Mizrahi Oct 31 '18 at 16:40

2 Answers2

2

Your motivating example is not necessarily a case of “deriving” halachah from gematria.

Rambam writes in is Commentary to Nazir 1:3 that the thirty-day nazir rule is a received tradition, which the Rabbis supported using the gematria as a hint.

I speculate that Rambam says this as he is loathe to view a gematria as the primary source for this halachah. This would suggest that he is of the opinion that one cannot straightforwardly derive laws from gematria.

Joel K
  • 43,068
  • 4
  • 62
  • 166
0

Halachah is ruled, not necessarily derived. It can be ruled in two ways:

  • either by learning the source and deriving from it, as you mentioned,

  • or by ruling it first and making an Asmachtah afterward (by relying on a verse).

This is very common with the Gemmarah and it is impossible to distinguish between them. I posted a question about this problem.

Your question is a good example of an Asmachtah for a Halachah - something that merely strengthens the claim.

Al Berko
  • 25,936
  • 2
  • 22
  • 57
  • Isn’t an asmachta usually a din derabbanan backed up with a hint from a pasuk? I’m pretty sure this is deoraita... – Joel K Oct 31 '18 at 15:45
  • @JoelK As we have no tools for judging a Halachah objectively, "anything goes" - whatever sounds reasonable proves your point. That's called אסמכתא. – Al Berko Oct 31 '18 at 15:48
  • @Al Berko -- OK, so it's an asmakhtah, but ARE we allowed to learn halacha from gematria? Any sources that directly address this question? – Maurice Mizrahi Oct 31 '18 at 16:12
  • There are no rules of how to rule Halochos. Our motto is כל דאלים גבר - everything goes. He can say "Cause I said so" - won't it suffice? BTW a sage does not have to give you his reasoning at all, maybe you won't understand, maybe you'll misunderstand and think it's BS. Sometimes he feels it's true but can't find a good supporting claim. – Al Berko Oct 31 '18 at 16:16
  • The Gemara asked: "From where is this rule derived?, not "What is the rule?". If an answer is given (and it is), must we assume THAT is the source? – Maurice Mizrahi Oct 31 '18 at 16:30
  • @AlBerko I think that’s a little cynical. “Cause I said so” would not seem to fall into one of Rambam’s five sources of halachot. – Joel K Oct 31 '18 at 16:55
  • @JoelK Have you talked to some Gdoylim in private? That's exactly what they say. אם הרב דומה למלאך צבאות ה' שמע בקולו. He does not need to explain himself - see what I commented to Maurice. – Al Berko Oct 31 '18 at 16:59
  • 3
    @AlBerko The quote is יבקשו תורה מפיהו, not שמע בקולו. You have to seek torah from him. Pronouncements ex cathedra are part of another religion. – Joel K Oct 31 '18 at 17:05
  • @JoelK I've got an impression that some people are interested in plain arguing more than finding the truth. – Al Berko Oct 31 '18 at 21:55