5

The Book of Numbers spans almost the entire 40 year period in the desert, documenting numerous events that occurred to the Jews as they wandered. I count only 5 dates mentioned in the text (listed in order of appearance in the book in the format DD/MM/YY with the Exodus as an epoch):

  • The first census (1:1) -- 01/02/02
  • The Commandment concerning the Korban Pesach (9:1) -- 01/01/02
  • The first journey from Mount Sinai (10:11) -- 20/02/02
  • The death of Miriam (20:1) -- 01/01/40
  • The death of Aharon (33:38) -- 01/05/40

The last two dates are definitely not the first ones I would have chosen to include, especially considering the dearth of dates in the book (no date on the spies, Asafsuf, Korach, any of the wars), and the dearth of Yahrtzeit's in Tanach in general (I can't think of any others off the top of my head). Why were these dates included?

Menachem
  • 44,362
  • 6
  • 127
  • 247
Double AA
  • 98,894
  • 6
  • 250
  • 713
  • 2
    The Torah doesn't record the date of the death of Miriam (she passed away on the 10th of Nissan - http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=24645&pgnum=78 ), rather, it records the date the Jews arrived at Kadesh. – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 06:14
  • @Menachem Pshat would indicate that everything in that pasuk happened (relatively) simultaneously. Do you know where he comes up with the 10th from? (See also http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/468?m=5138583#5138583) – Double AA Jul 19 '12 at 06:20
  • 1
    Nine days later is relatively simultaneously. As the verse says the Jews arrive at Kadesh, and that's where Miriam passed away. – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 06:24
  • @Menachem I don't think 9 days is simultaneous enough. Besides, now your telling me that the Torah isn't telling me the date of Miriam's death but rather the date of a single random travel of the Jews? That's even harder to swallow. || Finding the source of that Midrash might help us find an answer, but even if it doesn't explicitly contradict the pasuk, I don't think that makes it pshat. – Double AA Jul 19 '12 at 06:25
  • Actually, I looked at the verse again and it doesn't tell us the date they arrived at Kadesh, just the month. Also, that's your question, why tell us when they arrived. – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 06:34
  • @Menachem Bachodesh X without a date means the first of the month in a lot of places. this is the first one that pops to mind. Think of the it as 'on the new moon' and 'on the 5th since the new moon' (like 'in the 5th of his reign'). || The date of Miriam's yahrtzeit I can imagine. The date of a random travel is too far fetched for me. – Double AA Jul 19 '12 at 06:37
  • With regards to the date of Miriam's death, see Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 580:1 - http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14166&pgnum=104 Also, Shulchan Aruch HaRav Orach Chaim 430:1 - http://chabadlibrary.org/books/adhaz/sh/sh3/1/430/index.htm – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 06:41
  • 1
    @Menachem Those sources are later and later. We want earlier and earlier :) – Double AA Jul 19 '12 at 06:43
  • @Menachem Also see yirmiyahu 41:1 – Double AA Jul 19 '12 at 06:46
  • Shemot 19:1 is perhaps a proof against what you're saying, since the Rabbi learn out it was Rosh Chodesh from a Gzeirah Shavah from the word "HaZeh" – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 06:47
  • Rashi (and the Gemara) on Taanis 9A says that Miriam passed away during Nissan, and Aharon passed away on Rosh Chodesh Av. - http://hebrewbooks.org/shas.aspx?mesechta=10&daf=9&format=pdf – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 06:55
  • those sources can help find earlier sources. – Menachem Jul 19 '12 at 07:32
  • 1
    http://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/4546/on-which-day-in-teveis-did-this-happen?rq=1#comment5251_4624 – Double AA Nov 08 '12 at 01:02
  • Seder Olam Rabbah says Rosh Chodesh, but the Gra says it should be the 10th: http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46767&pgnum=40 – Menachem Jun 16 '13 at 22:55
  • @Menachem I don't follow his logic. Is it just a girsa change based on some manuscript? – Double AA Jun 16 '13 at 22:59
  • It is a girsa change based on the Seder Olam Rabbah 4 pages later (first line of the page): http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46767&pgnum=44 – Menachem Jun 16 '13 at 23:16
  • @Menachem See ibn ezra – Double AA Sep 11 '13 at 06:25
  • Similar: http://judaism.stackexchange.com/q/32007 – msh210 Nov 01 '13 at 07:01
  • It is said in the Targum Yonathan ben Uzziel : https://www.sefaria.org/Numbers.20.1?lang=bi&with=Targum%20Jonathan%20on%20Numbers&lang2=he. I believe it is an early enough source for you guys – Eli83 Jun 28 '23 at 20:39
  • @Eli83 Nice find. Probably the braisa about the fast days referenced above is earlier. Targum "Yonatan" on the Torah is not known to be earlier than most RIshonim. – Double AA Jun 28 '23 at 20:52

1 Answers1

3

Some of this is conjecture on my part, but it seems like Rashi commentary discusses why we need all these dates (except Aharon's passing). He seems to be implicitly answering your question.

  • The first census

    Rashi (Bamidbar 1:1) says that G-d often counted the Jews because He loved them. The Maskil Ledavid, in his commentary on Rashi, explains that all the other times the Jews were counted one could argue that it was for a specific need (e.g. after a plague), the Torah here tells us the date the commandment to count was given to show us that there was no specific reason to count the Jews. The commandment was only given because G-d loved them and wanted to count them. (see there for more details).

  • The Commandment concerning the Korban Pesach

    Rashi (Bamidbar 9:1) says that we are explicitly told that this event happened before the events beginning of Bamidbar to teach us that there is no set order to the Torah.

    Without the dates given, some would argue that this was not out of order.

  • The first journey from Mount Sinai

    The Gur Aryeh explains Rashi (Bamidbar 10:11) as follows: Why does the Torah tell us the date they left, so that we know it was almost 12 months. Just like a Chatan must stay with his wife during the first year of marriage, so too G-d and the Jews did not travel for the first year (See the Gur Aryeh for an explanation of why they left 10 days early and did not wait the full year).

  • The Jews arrival at Kadesh (followed by the death of Miriam)

    WARNING: This is weak conjecture on my part -- Rashi (Bamidbar 20:2) tells us that we see that the Jews had water all 40 years in the merit of Miriam, since it stopped after her death. However, since Miriam passed away in the first half of the month of Nissan, it would not be before the 40th year started, on the 15th of Nissan, only be 39 years, not 40.

    However, we already know that the first Rosh Chodesh Nissan the Jews spent in the desert was called "The Second Year" (Bamidbar 9:1. See Gittin 60B - mentioned in Rashi 5:2 - that this was Rosh Chodesh).

    So we can say that Rashi is saying that this is why the Torah tells us they arrived at Kadesh in Nissan, to let us know that they arrived once the 40th year had already started. Based on the principle "Miktzat Shana K'Shana", Rashi is saying that the water was provided in Miriam's honor for 40 years in the desert.

  • The death of Aharon

    I'm not sure about this one. I haven't found a Rashi that discusses the date of Aharon's passing.

Alternative reason why the Torah mentions when Miriam and Aharon passed away:

Zechariah 11:8 says, "And I cut off the three shepherds in one month". The Talmud (Ta'anit 9A) says that this refers to Moshe, Aharon, and Miriam. If the Torah didn't tell us the dates Miriam and Aharon passed away, I might think that they all passed away in the same month.

[Instead, the Talmud says that after Miriam and Aharon passed away, the Well and Clouds disappeared, only to reappear in the merit of Moshe. When Moshe passed away all three disappeared again. This was considered as if Moshe, Aharon, and Miriam were taken at the same time.]

Menachem
  • 44,362
  • 6
  • 127
  • 247