Silmarillion & Book of Lost Tales, which should I read first?

Question

Several years back I read The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings.

I recently discovered (when going through some old boxes I hadn't unpacked after moving house) that I've got a few additional books which I've never read, mainly The Silmarillion and The Book of Lost Tales Pt. 1 + 2.

Is there any order to these? Which should I read first? Or doesn't it matter?

Those are all very good clear answers. I would def agree with reading the Silmarillion first, unfinished tales second followed by lost tales. Encyclopedia of arda or tolkein gateway are essentials as mentioned. — , Jun 11 '13 at 18:34

score 19 · Accepted Answer · edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:43

19

I asked a similar, more general question ~~on Literature.SE~~ about the reading order of all of Tolkien's works. The consensus was that The Silmarillion should come before the less mature HoME. The Silmarillion is a few well-developed stories about the First Age, while The Book of Lost Tales is a collection of story fragments and edited notes covering some of the same content. By reading The Silmarillion first you will have a better understanding of the history as Tolkien intended us to read it (though even The Silmarillion was not complete at the time of his death), then you can go back to Lost Tales and see how the stories developed from earlier notes.

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:43

Community

1

answered Oct 10 '11 at 14:34

Travis Christian

7,555
4
47
63

Thanks for this, I had never thought about the literature site ... – takrl Oct 11 '11 at 10:48
1

That question is now here: http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/15534/in-what-order-should-tolkiens-writings-on-middle-earth-be-read – Wade Aug 28 '16 at 22:37
@Wade And mine is now a duplicate of one that didn't exist when I wrote it. – takrl Sep 08 '17 at 11:26
1

@takrl And mine is now migrated from a site that exists again where it would still be on topic. What a tangled interweb we weave. – Travis Christian Sep 08 '17 at 20:55

score 9 · Answer 2 · answered Oct 10 '11 at 14:29

9

I would recommend reading The Silmarillion first. That's the order of publication, and The Book of Lost Tales contains only fragments of stories that will act as spoilers for the more coherent story contained in The Silmarillion.

answered Oct 10 '11 at 14:29

Mike Scott

62,199
4
201
241

score 6 · Answer 3 · answered Oct 12 '11 at 15:34

6

I'd agree that you should read The Silmarillion first, but would just add that you should probably read Unfinished Tales next, before the two BoLT volumes. UT includes additional versions of several of the stories from the Silmarillion, as well as a whole lot of extra information about Tolkien's world (including who the Wizards really were).

answered Oct 12 '11 at 15:34

Daniel Roseman

63,797
16
188
228

Strongly Agree -- Unfinished Tales should be considered HOME vol 0. Read it before any of the Official HOME books. – Sean McMillan Oct 14 '11 at 13:36

score 1 · Answer 4 · answered Dec 22 '11 at 19:53

1

Besides the order everyone suggests, if you've never read the lorebooks, I would suggest you have a browser handy with the Encyclopedia of Arda on it...because you likely WILL get lost in the names and details.

answered Dec 22 '11 at 19:53

Gulhir The Grey

2,205
20
11

Two bookmarks: one in the text, and one in the index, will generally work just as well. The index in The Silmarillion is really good, and also includes a little potted biography or description with all the entries. – TRiG Sep 30 '12 at 20:51

Silmarillion & Book of Lost Tales, which should I read first?

4 Answers4