Something doesn't quite add up with the concept of the "End of Time" in Loki.
He Who Remains, aka Kang the Conqueror, dies at the End of Time. Killed, I wager, is more precise. That was Season 1. Season 2 begins, and, clearly, there are events in Season 2 that occur AFTER Kang died. Yes, Loki time slips both in and out of the TVA. But the whole season is basically "Temporal Loom is bad. We need a He Who Remains variant to fix the darn thing," and they find one in Victor Timely. With all these brilliant minds and centuries for Loki to gain all that knowledge, you'd think someone would have asked if the temporal loom plot device could handle infinite timelines, coupled with the throughput multiplier plot device.
But the point is that it defies logic to say that the "End of Time" is the actual end of time. Whose time? Which timeline? If anything that could ever happen was orchestrated by He Who Remains up until the End of Time, that would mean Season 2 and the finale itself all happened before Kang dies at the End of Time. Once time ends, it ends, and everything becomes nothing. The act of being, existing, becomes non-existent or incomprehensible for beings such as us, who can only experience or perceive what we call life in 3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time. To my brain, it's illogical that what He Who Remains claims is the "End of Time" is the actual end of time.
Does anyone have an explanation as to what this so-called "End of Time" is and if it's on a timeline? Perhaps this has been explained in the comics?