12

In the Terminator movies, Skynet is trying to kill Sarah and John Connor, sending various terminators from the future to hunt them down.

So my question is: who made the time machine to go back to past? Did Skynet do so, or was it previously made by humans and then taken over by Skynet?

LogicDictates
  • 116,405
  • 22
  • 418
  • 512

1 Answers1

11

According to the official novelisations of the first and second films, the Time Displacement Equipment (TDE) was developed by Skynet.

As far as Reese knew, he was the first living man to be temporally displaced. Skynet had developed the hardware as part of its voracious research and development, a geometrically expanding computer-generated repertoire of new technologies.

The human raiders had seized the place intact, and the techs had scurried to download the system files and analyze them. When they realized what Skynet had done in its coldly rational desperation, John had opted to use its own technology as counterforce. But when Reese had stepped into the biaxial node of the field generator, no one really knew if the time displacement was survivable. He might have arrived in 1984, an already-cooling bag of meat, his heart stopped by unfathomable energies.

The Terminator novelisation by Randall Frakes

Kyle Reese had taught her this paranoia, learned from years of scrabbling in the postwar ruins, fighting off killer cyborgs and renegade humans. He'd been a soldier most of his life, he had said. It was the only way to have a life, up there in the future. Upthen, he'd called it. Where huge war machines rolled over the bones of millions; the dead, the flash-burned or the irradiatedout-of-existence. But John Connor had rallied the pitiful survivors into a threadbare resistance force. And little by little, humanity began to take back territory from the metal masters. Until one day the tide of battle turned, and Skynet, in a desperate burst of brilliance, devised time displacement, the first tactical time weapon. It sent a lethal emissary back through time to find and eliminate Sarah, so that John Connor might never be born.

But John's forces took control of the time displacement device and sent Kyle through, to stop the Terminator, if possible. It was essentially a suicide mission, and yet he had volunteered for it. He was a simple soldier about to walk point into the gaping maw of history because he loved Sarah.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day novelisation by Randall Frakes

In the novelisation of the first film, it was noted that the reason Kyle materialised in mid-air when he arrived in 1984, rather than on the ground, was due to the Resistance's lack of familiarity with the TDE.

He rubbed his arm unconsciously—a bloody scrape where he came down. The techs had brought him in high. With so little time to familiarize themselves with the displacement-field equipment and its calibration, they must have erred on the side of safety. Better than materializing knee-deep in pavement. Right.

The Terminator novelisation by Randall Frakes

LogicDictates
  • 116,405
  • 22
  • 418
  • 512
  • Of course, we see both Skynet and the Resistance using time machines before their invention in subsequent films. – Valorum Aug 16 '23 at 11:43
  • 3
    Well, it seems that there are ripples from the changes caused by the time travel, chips from the Terminator being analyzed and kicking off the Terminator program, John Conner being sired by the time traveler, etc. And that's not even getting into the common fan theory (pretty sure it's just a fan theory still) that the Terminator killed the "right" Sarah Conner early in the film, but those actions resulted in Linda Hamilton's character becoming an even better mother to the savior of humanity. – FuzzyBoots Aug 16 '23 at 13:26
  • 1
    In an earlier version of the script there were two time travellers. The first had an unfortunate incident involving his arrival inside the pavement. – Valorum Aug 16 '23 at 18:15
  • @FuzzyBoots - I wouldn't pay much heed to fan theories regarding the Terminator films, especially those positing that the events of the first film actually changed the timeline in some way. Both the film itself and its novelisation indicate that the film took place within a time loop in which nothing changed; the time travellers didn't alter history because they were part of the history of that timeline all along. The novelisation of the second film indicates that the time loop wasn't broken until Sarah went after Dyson about halfway through that film. – LogicDictates Aug 16 '23 at 19:36
  • @Valorum - "we see both Skynet and the Resistance using time machines before their invention in subsequent films." I'm struggling to recall what you're referring to in regard to the films, although I am aware of that being the case in The Sarah Connor Chronicles. – LogicDictates Aug 16 '23 at 19:46
  • @LogicDictates - That and the more recent Terminator films. Plus the ride! – Valorum Aug 16 '23 at 20:14
  • 1
    @Valorum - Come to think of it, we did see time machines being built in 1984 and 2017 in Terminator Genisys. Those aspects of the film were very reminiscent of The Sarah Connor Chronicles, especially the pilot episode. – LogicDictates Aug 16 '23 at 20:48
  • Was it an option to send Kyle Reese back in time to the location where Skynet built the time displacement machine and destroy it before it could be used? – RobertF Aug 17 '23 at 15:33
  • @RobertF - I'm not aware of any indication that the Resistance knew when the TDE was built, in which case they could only guess the correct date, send Kyle there, and hope they got lucky. And they'd need a lot of luck, because even if they got the date right, Kyle would arrive naked and unarmed, and would have to figure out how to singlehandedly destroy a massive machine that'd likely be under observation by multiple terminators. Also, John knew that Kyle was his father, so if he didn't send Kyle to rescue Sarah, he couldn't be sure what effect that'd have on his own existence. – LogicDictates Aug 17 '23 at 19:56