7

In the Next Generation episode Legacy, we learn that the Federation colony on the planet Turkana IV descended into civil war and anarchy, something Starfleet and the Federation seemingly just allowed to happen.

Why didn't Starfleet try to restore order and take the colony back? Surely that seems a better alternative to just abandoning it.

Paul D. Waite
  • 32,172
  • 20
  • 133
  • 197
Nu'Daq
  • 26,163
  • 11
  • 84
  • 220
  • 1
    Out-of-universe: It may have been a poorly thought through premise in support of an action story where the crew is pulled into a moral and emotional conflict because of just one person. If true, it may be difficult or impossible to explain in-universe. – Anthony X Aug 04 '21 at 22:30
  • 1
    My reading is that this was a lost Earth colony which pre-dated the forming of the Federation, Hence the no-contact rule may have applied. – Paulie_D Aug 04 '21 at 22:32
  • Episode titles go in quotation marks. – Ham Sandwich Aug 04 '21 at 23:13
  • 2
    Out universe I think it was an attempt to establish a TOS style notion that the frontier is dangerous and civilization needs constant effort. Note how Kirk grew up on a colony with a food shortage that turned genocidal. As for a legal precedent there are far more episodes that establish starfleet doesn't think the prime directive really applies to humans despite being centuries separated. – lucasbachmann Aug 04 '21 at 23:28
  • @lucasbachmann "Kirk grew up on a colony" -- huh? Everything I've seen and read says Kirk grew up in what had been Ohio... – Zeiss Ikon Aug 05 '21 at 13:25
  • 3
    @ZeissIkon He was born on Iowa, but at some point Kirk moves to Tarsus IV, where he becomes one of the witnesses to Kodos the Executioner's massacre. I don't remember how old he was though. – pboss3010 Aug 05 '21 at 13:58
  • 1
    @Zeiss Ikon Also - Kirk wasn't from Iowa until Star Trek IV. The original Star Trek was not nearly as Earth centric as later iterations. Even the inventor of warp drive Zephram Cochrane was from Alpha Centauri originally. – lucasbachmann Aug 05 '21 at 16:41
  • @Zeiss there'd be no reason for states to stop being states, I'm sure Ohio will still be Ohio. They might be on the same governmental tier as Scotland, Belgium and the JAO, but I'm sure the capitol will still be Columbus and the territory will be about the same, give or take the Toledo Strip. – Harper - Reinstate Monica Aug 05 '21 at 17:45
  • Nothng says that Kirk grew up on Tarsus IV. NOthing says how much or little time Kirk spent there before and after the faminine and massacre, and nothing says anything about whether his parents and siblings were also on Tarsus IV. Making simple & reasonable - but not certain - chronological assumptions, one can deduce that Kirk was about 13 at the time of the massacre. – M. A. Golding Aug 05 '21 at 18:30
  • https://memory-beta.fandom.com/wiki/Turkana_IV - The Federation was asked to leave by the legitimate government and really had no choice but to do so, short of invasion – Valorum Aug 06 '21 at 17:28
  • @Nu'Daq Melota! – Rainbow Aug 20 '21 at 23:26

1 Answers1

13

The third item in the "What doesn't work" section of the Star Trek: The Next Generation writers/directors guide notes that Starfleet isn't the space police. They're not there to maintain and enforce a particular vision of order on the galaxy, or even on worlds affiliated to the Federation. (See also Starfleet's military status, or lack thereof.)

As detailed on Memory Alpha, some colonies in the Next Generation period seem to be pretty autonomous from the Federation, even if they were originally established as Federation colonies. Much as alien worlds who join the Federation maintain some self-determination, the objective of some colonies might be to become independent worlds, rather than being ultimately governed by the Federation.

And sometimes in space, things don't go according to plan — Starfleet isn't omnipotent, and the Federation doesn't have enough starships and diplomats to send them to every colony that has problems. Once Turkana 4 declared independence, which seems to have happened some time before society completely broke down, it ceased being a part of the Federation. Starfleet would be invading if they tried to take control of the situation, and that's just not what they do.

A Starfleet ship did attempt to re-establish contact just nine short years after the colony cut themselves off, and for all we know, Starfleet provided some degree of evacuation back when things were going badly. Some people (like Tasha Yar) still made it off the planet and into Starfleet itself; while others (like Tasha’s sister Ishara) decided to stay, as they supported one of the factions vying for control of the colony, and didn't seem to have any interest in Starfleet assuming control of their colony.

Paul D. Waite
  • 32,172
  • 20
  • 133
  • 197
  • Bull- if an alien power had occupied the planet, Starfleet wouldn't have just left them, they'd have done something about it. – Nu'Daq Aug 04 '21 at 22:39
  • 1
    @Nu'Daq: sure! That's the thing about planetary civil wars: there aren't any occupiers, everyone's already there. – Paul D. Waite Aug 04 '21 at 22:44
  • @Nu'Daq: I mean, at least street gangs stick to one planet. That's fewer people in danger. If you want to start your own space police, go ahead buddy! Good luck with that! – Paul D. Waite Aug 04 '21 at 22:50
  • Plus I'm pretty sure Turkana was known for its rape gangs. The various factions were probably super-proud about how you never saw gangs in the streets – Paul D. Waite Aug 04 '21 at 22:56
  • Even invading the planet would be preferable to just washing their hands of it and leaving thugs in charge. – Nu'Daq Aug 04 '21 at 23:03
  • @Nu'Daq - You can't just go around invading places because you don't like how they're run, not least because other powerful nations might not like how their smaller neighbours are run. – Valorum Aug 05 '21 at 07:13
  • 9
    "You can't just go around invading places because you don't like how they're run" unless there's oil there... – Tim Aug 05 '21 at 08:15
  • @Tim or a series of planetary rings that provide eternal life and firmer breasts. – Paul D. Waite Aug 05 '21 at 08:48
  • 1
    @Nu'Daq: "Even invading the planet would be preferable to just washing their hands of it and leaving thugs in charge"— not according to Starfleet's values. If you think it's better to invade planets to improve their quality of life, go ahead and find yourself a Borg ship to assimilate into! – Paul D. Waite Aug 05 '21 at 13:05
  • Isn't this much of the point of the Prime Directive? – Barmar Aug 05 '21 at 15:03
  • @Barmar: that's the great thing about the Prime Directive — it's not actually written down anywhere, so it can have almost any point you want! But sure, I think a reasonable summary of the Prime Directive's purpose is to stop Starfleet from playing god. That's not quite as much of a concern with a colony that was apparently founded by the Federation in the first place (you're not really playing god if you did actually create the society in question), but Starfleet does seem unwilling to interfere. – Paul D. Waite Aug 05 '21 at 15:33
  • 3
    Invading a member planet because of internal strife also has a tendency to make your other members rather nervous. Everyone from Vulcan to Bajor will end up thinking "if we don't toe the line, will the Federation invade us next?" and that's never a good look. – Cadence Aug 05 '21 at 16:09
  • @Tim you can bet your last quatoo that Star Fleet would have invaded a major source of dilithium crystals, if the planet's government supported terrorism, and diplomacy failed. – RonJohn Aug 05 '21 at 16:55
  • 1
    I don't believe that the Prime Directive would apply to an Earth colony, just alien civilizations. – Emsley Wyatt Aug 05 '21 at 17:13