4

This question covers why he wouldn't want to steal one and use it, but that doesn't explain why he wouldn't want to steal them all anyway. Regardless of if you plan on using it, simultaneously gaining access to (maybe risky) time travel and forbidding it to your enemies is a pretty sweet deal. So, assuming that he knew where to look for them, why didn't send someone to grab all of them during the events that take place in the ministry during the fifth book?

J. Mini
  • 4,803
  • 2
  • 27
  • 72
  • 2
    Perhaps all of them were located inside of Hogwarts? –  Jul 10 '20 at 18:51
  • @user255577 Reread book 5 chapter 35. – J. Mini Jul 10 '20 at 18:52
  • 3
    What's the point of this question? One could ask why Voldemort didn't do any number of things? Why didn't he just blow up Hogwarts? Why not set the forbidden forest ablaze? Why not abolish the ministry of magic? Voldemort can't do anything and everything and perhaps the simplest answer for why he didn't take a particular action is because he just didn't. There's nothing to suggest Voldemort considered every possible option for every possible scenario and came up with a valid, logical reason for why he did/didn't do that thing. This question seems unanswerable in that light. – zephyr Jul 10 '20 at 19:19
  • @zephyr This question is asked in the hopes that there is a good reason why he didn't do it. If there isn't, then you're right by default, but the hope is that you aren't. – J. Mini Jul 10 '20 at 19:36
  • I guess what I mean is, do you have an impetus or reason for wanting to ask this? Is there something that leads you to believe Voldemort may have thought about this or wanted to do it but didn't? Otherwise, I don't see this as any different than a generic question of "Why didn't Voldemore do X"? where X is just any crazy thing anyone can dream up. – zephyr Jul 10 '20 at 19:39
  • 1
    @zephyr Why didn't Voldemort establish a brand of really good garlic and lemon dip? ;) – Lexible Jul 10 '20 at 20:01
  • @zephyr Because as far as I can tell, he had the means, method, and motive to do this. – J. Mini Jul 10 '20 at 22:30
  • Did he have the motive? Do we know this? Just because it may or may not have been a good idea to do doesn't mean he had motive. That's my entire point. What's the justification for asking about this specific action? Voldemort may have had motive to start his own garlic and lemon dip production company for the financial benefit to fund his deatheaters, but I can't imagine anyone asking a question about why he didn't do that. – zephyr Jul 10 '20 at 22:37
  • @zephyr Why a character doesn't take an action that appears to be a very effective use of resources is a good question. This is why questions like "why didn't these wizards use guns?" are worth asking and lemon drips are not. – J. Mini Jul 10 '20 at 23:35
  • He didn't have enough time. – Alex Jul 12 '20 at 14:46

1 Answers1

2

It would have been a waste of effort.

Voldemort had several things that he and his Death Eaters needed to do to achieve his goals of immortality and world domination - such as gaining more followers, infiltrating the mind, devising a way to kill Harry Potter. Finding and stealing the Time-Turners would be a waste of their time and effort. Stealing them so his enemies would not have them would not give him much of an advantage, because they are of very limited use. First of all, changing time is breaking one of the most important wizarding laws, so his enemies are likely to be unwilling to even attempt to use the Time-Turners to do this.

“Hermione,’ said Harry suddenly, ‘what if we – we just run in there, and grab Pettigrew –’

‘No!’ said Hermione in a terrified whisper. ‘Don’t you understand? We’re breaking one of the most important wizarding laws! Nobody’s supposed to change time, nobody! You heard Dumbledore, if we’re seen –”
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 21 (Hermione’s Secret)

In fact, through the Ministry, Voldemort’s enemies did have access to Time-Turners, since McGonagall got one for the Ministry for Hermione to use for her classes, but they never attempted to use them to change time to reverse any of his victories, even significant victories like his restoration to a proper body.

“Where did you get that hourglass thing?’

‘It’s called a Time-Turner,’ Hermione whispered, ‘and I got it from Professor McGonagall on our first day back. I’ve been using it all year to get to all my lessons. Professor McGonagall made me swear I wouldn’t tell anyone. She had to write all sorts of letters to the Ministry of Magic so I could have one. She had to tell them that I was a model student, and that I’d never, ever use it for anything except my studies … I’ve been turning it back so I could do hours over again, that’s how I’ve been doing several lessons at once, see?”
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 21 (Hermione’s Secret)

Furthermore, using them is so risky, it may actually benefit him more to leave them in the hands of his enemies, because they could cause more damage to themselves than him.

“Exactly! You wouldn’t understand, you might even attack yourself! Don’t you see? Professor McGonagall told me what awful things have happened when wizards have meddled with time … loads of them ended up killing their past or future selves by mistake!”
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 21 (Hermione's Secret)

He could also be assured that they would not be able to reverse any of his victories for longer than a few hours after them. If they attempted to travel too far back in time, Voldemort’s enemies would be certain to cause themselves serious harm, which would actively benefit him.

All attempts to travel back further than a few hours have resulted in catastrophic harm to the witch or wizard involved. It was not realised for many years why time travellers over great distances never survived their journeys. All such experiments have been abandoned since 1899, when Eloise Mintumble became trapped, for a period of five days, in the year 1402. Now we understand that her body had aged five centuries in its return to the present and, irreparably damaged, she died in St Mungo’s Hospital for Magical Maladies and Injuries shortly after we managed to retrieve her.
- Time-Turner (Wizarding World website)

It would only even be possible for them to change time to reverse one of his victories for around five hours without it being certain to cause serious problems for themselves.

As our investigations currently stand, the longest period that may be relived without the possibility of serious harm to the traveller or to time itself is around five hours. We have been able to encase single Hour-Reversal Charms, which are unstable and benefit from containment, in small, enchanted hour-glasses that may be worn around a witch or wizard’s neck and revolved according to the number of hours the user wishes to relive.
- Time-Turner (Wizarding World website)

Even going back in time one hour can be potentially dangerous, which is why Time-Turners are heavily regulated by the Ministry of Magic.

While not as potentially dangerous as skipping five centuries, the re-use of a single hour can still have dramatic consequences and the Ministry of Magic seeks the strictest guarantees if it permits the use of these rare and powerful objects.
- Time-Turner (Wizarding World website)

Since his enemies are likely to be unwilling to risk using them, if they did they would only have a window of a few hours to change anything, and attempting to do so is reasonably likely to cause them more harm than good, it would be a waste of his time and effort for Voldemort to steal all the Time-Turners.

Obsidia
  • 105,547
  • 18
  • 451
  • 493