15

I have read all seven Harry Potter books, and The Cursed Child1, but I've only watched the first two movies.

Do I have to watch all eight movies in order to fully understand the significant plot points found in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them?

Is there anything that I'll miss by not having seen them?


1 Waste of money, that.

Ankit Sharma
  • 10,428
  • 7
  • 57
  • 93
Mithical
  • 38,898
  • 17
  • 178
  • 229

2 Answers2

6

Will you miss much if you don't see the movies? Not really. Will you miss much if you don't read the books? Most definitely. The main story line of this series of movies Rowling is writing is under the surface in Fantastic Beasts. Although it is a fun movie and it seems the plot was straight forward, that is clearly not the case if one has knowledge of the books in hand. This movie is setting up Grindelwald's back story and leading up to his fight with Dumbledore. That is the main purpose of this second series of movies. If you haven't seen the original Harry Potter movies you will be perfectly fine. As @gallifreian commented, the movies don't add anything of consequence to the plot.

Glorfindel
  • 76
  • 4
4

Do I have to watch all eight movies in order to fully understand the significant plot points found in 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them'?

No. The Harry Potter films arguably followed the books for the most part, and none of the significant elements in Fantastic Beasts were based on the movie inventions. Just reading the seven novels should be enough, though you may also want to read the three tie-in writings that Rowling released online. (1, 2, 3)

Is there anything that I'll miss by not having seen them?

There are several visual elements that take reference from previous Harry Potter films, due to the fact that MinaLima is still doing the artwork and David Yates is still directing. None of these are important to the plot. The only parts I can think of which may particularly jarring to someone who hasn't seen the previous movies is that there is an unexplained instance of priori incantatem (which in the books only happens when wands have twin cores) and there is an instance of a person using magic to fly (which in the books is generally said to be impossible).

ibid
  • 93,732
  • 37
  • 488
  • 567
  • 1
    Doesn't Mr. Diggory do priori incantatem to Harry's wand (stolen by Winky) at the beginning of Goblet of Fire? – Oriol Jan 01 '17 at 20:05
  • @Oriol - Maybe I used the wrong phrase? One is a spell and one is a phenomenon that happens when wizards duel with wand having twin cores. – ibid Jan 01 '17 at 20:39
  • Huh, and I saw the whole movie and didn't notice the priori incantatem at all. When did that happen, exactly? – Wildcard Aug 09 '17 at 03:39
  • @Wildcard When Tina and Grave duel. It was even in some of the trailers. – ibid Aug 09 '17 at 08:17