7

Watching 'The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies', I saw some grade-A marksmanship from Bard, using one of the dragon-killing black arrows to hit Smaug in precisely the spot where ONE of his scales is gone.

literally one scale

On top of that, the ballista tower was damaged and he can't even use the ballista anymore, prompting him to use his son as a makeshift ballista.

Is there any evidence of how Bard became a good marksman?

(I understand that the movie adaptation of the book is different, but my question is how did Bard become that skilled)

enter image description hereHis son by the way looks terrified

Fox-Chan
  • 763
  • 6
  • 24
  • 1
    If you have multiple questions, you should ask them as more than one question. – Valorum May 07 '16 at 15:57
  • 3
    @Richard is correct. I suggest you edit this post so that it's only asking what's in the title, and perhaps post your other queries as separate questions. (Though I suspect the answer to "where did Bard become such a good marksman?" is simply "we don't know". Also his shot was surely a mixture of BOTH great skill AND extraordinary luck.) – Rand al'Thor May 07 '16 at 16:16
  • Your edit hasn't improved the question – Valorum May 07 '16 at 17:12
  • 6
    I would say the Force was with Bard, but since this is Middle Earth, I'll just say that Illuvatar was with him that day instead. – thegreatjedi May 25 '16 at 16:09
  • 6
  • The movie doesn't accurately reflect things as per the book. Movie Bard is superhuman.
  • Book Bard missed many times, and as a last ditch effort resorted to using his Black Arrow, an old black arrow that had been passed down in his family. He had no expectation of it working.
  • This might be answerable with a movie novelization (if one exists), but the way in which you ask it makes it impossible otherwise.

    –  May 25 '16 at 16:48
  • 1
    @Axelrod - There's no novelisation of The Hobbit, nor will there ever be :-) – Valorum May 26 '16 at 14:16
  • 1
    what are you talking about? Tolkien made a book titled The Hobbit – Fox-Chan May 26 '16 at 14:37
  • 4
    I think Valorum may be commenting on the order of the creation of the comparative works (ie - the films are an adaptation of a novel written in the 30's, whereas a novelization is an adaptation of a film). or...it is a commentary on the insane mess that is the Hobbit films – NKCampbell May 26 '16 at 14:56
  • 3
    Yar. The movie is a filmization of the book, not the other way round. – Wad Cheber May 26 '16 at 15:06
  • Oh sorry I thought that was what he ment – Fox-Chan May 26 '16 at 15:39
  • @Valorum Yeah, until Christopher Tolkien and New Line Cinema want more money, at least. ;) –  May 26 '16 at 16:12
  • @Axelrod - No, the scripts are written for filming (whoever wrote them and/or whoever bought the scripts owns the copyrights to the scripts), so they're part of the movie process. And it isn't legally possible to make a novelization of The Hobbit, because the Tolkien estate sold the rights for film adaptation, but retains the rights for print material. – Wad Cheber May 26 '16 at 16:14
  • @WadCheber And they've never resorted to grabs for money. –  May 26 '16 at 16:17
  • 2
    @Axelrod - No, they haven't. J.R.R. Tolkien sold the film rights himself, and when he died, he left instructions for Christoper Tolkien to finish Silmarillion, UT, etc. and publish them. As far as I am aware, the estate hasn't sold the rights to anything. – Wad Cheber May 26 '16 at 16:26
  • @Axelrod - http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/129237/has-tolkiens-estate-ever-sold-the-rights-to-adaptations-of-any-tolkien-works – Wad Cheber May 26 '16 at 16:49
  • I'm assuming he learned to shoot the same way you get to Carnegie Hall. – Valorum May 26 '16 at 17:26
  • 1
    According to Terry Pratchett, shots that have a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of making it do connect in 9 out of 10 times. So all Bard had to do was to make things worse to adjust the odds. – Marvel Boy Feb 04 '21 at 21:34