2

The Third Geneva Convention guarantees several human rights to prisoners of war. Suppose Country A captures prisoners of war, puts them to trial for a specific offense, gives them a good defense lawyer, and, if they are found guilty, executes them. Suppose capital punishment is legal in Country A, so the POWs are subject to the same procedure that would be used for citizens of Country A - they are not discriminated against because of their POW status. Would it be legal under international law?

To give an example: suppose Israel enacts a law that disallows membership in Hamas, for which the punishment is death. Then, Israel puts Hamas militants captured during the war to a due trial, with a good lawyer, and if they are found guilty - they are executed. Would it be legal according to international law?

Trish
  • 48,907
  • 3
  • 98
  • 200
Erel Segal-Halevi
  • 203
  • 2
  • 8

3 Answers3

13

Under Art. 99 of the Geneva Convention,

No prisoner of war may be tried or sentenced for an act which is not forbidden by the law of the Detaining Power or by international law, in force at the time the said act was committed.

No moral or physical coercion may be exerted on a prisoner of war in order to induce him to admit himself guilty of the act of which he is accused.

No prisoner of war may be convicted without having had an opportunity to present his defence and the assistance of a qualified advocate or counsel.

This limits crimes to acts which were crimes before being captured. In addition though not stated in the convention, only acts can be punished (e.g. you cannot be punished for "being Arab"). The death penalty is addressed in Art 100

Prisoners of war and the Protecting Powers shall be informed as soon as possible of the offences which are punishable by the death sentence under the laws of the Detaining Power.

Other offences shall not thereafter be made punishable by the death penalty without the concurrence of the Power upon which the prisoners of war depend.

The death sentence cannot be pronounced on a prisoner of war unless the attention of the court has, in accordance with Article 87, second paragraph , been particularly called to the fact that since the accused is not a national of the Detaining Power, he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance, and that he is in its power as the result of circumstances independent of his own will.

("the Power upon which the prisoners of war depend" refers to the nation, the Detaining Power, that captures them as opposed to the specific military unit / individual). The death penalty is thus a legal possibility.

user6726
  • 217,390
  • 11
  • 353
  • 587
10

Yes

There have been many examples of such trials, the most famous being the Nuremberg trials following World War II. While some of the defendants were civilians, many were service personnel and therefore prisoners of war.

The convention is also clear that escaping prisoners cannot be charged with a crime unless that crime harms another person. For example, if they steal something, they can be administratively punished but if they murder someone, they can be put on trial and criminally punished - including with death if that is on the table.

Dale M
  • 233,645
  • 18
  • 270
  • 539
1

In your specific case, Israel really doesn't have a death penalty. According to Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Israel, Israel has asked for the death penalty twice, and carried it out once, against Adolf Eichmann.

As a practical matter, there have been several times when Israel soldiers have been accused of "extrajudicial" executions. Several of those soldiers were court martialed, some of them were found guilty and given severe sentences.

War is a horrible thing and it should be avoided if at all possible. That written, the middle east has been at war with itself for thousands of years. I suspect that most of the people who live there have no conception of what it means to live in peace.

Jeff Silverman
  • 127
  • 2