0

Are there any readings discussing the Haredi (Hasidic, orthodox non-Mizrachi) stance on political Zionism prior to the establishment of the State of Israel?

Did it change with the establishment of the state? If so, in what way?

Any recommended readings on the topic?

mbloch
  • 51,726
  • 9
  • 92
  • 240
El Shteiger
  • 2,991
  • 18
  • 29
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haredim_and_Zionism useful – רבות מחשבות Nov 20 '18 at 04:27
  • דברי יואל from the Satmar rebbe – kouty Nov 20 '18 at 05:01
  • 1
    @kouty Wasn't that after 1948? – ezra Nov 20 '18 at 05:16
  • Herzl established the Zionist Movement in 1897, which was 9 years after R' Shimshon Raphael Hirsch's passing, but he (R' Hirsch) did write many things which would lead us to conclude he was opposed to Zionism. https://judaism.stackexchange.com/a/12154/11486 – ezra Nov 20 '18 at 05:20
  • @ezra yeeh..... – kouty Nov 20 '18 at 06:10
  • @kouty Pre-1948 Haredi view on political Zionism and how it developed – ezra Nov 20 '18 at 06:38
  • Divrei Yoel @kouty was a continuation of the Satmar Rebbe's grandfather's(R' Moshe Teitelbaum ztz"l)view of Zionism which was way before 1948. They weren't alone in their views in that anti-zionism was the norm in almost all orthodox circles because the original zionists were vehemently anti-religious. Remember, Herzl offered to make Israel a catholic state in order to appease the pope; so long as the Jews had their own state...Modern zionism is based on heretic foundations. – chacham Nisan Nov 20 '18 at 16:27

2 Answers2

2

For one perspective on how an anti-Zionist changed perspectives 180 degrees and became a supporter, I would highly recommend Eim HaBanim Semeicha by R Yissachar Shlomo Teichtal

From Wikipedia

Teichtal grew up as a staunch anti-Zionist Chasid of the Munkatsher Rebbe. However, during the Holocaust, Rabbi Teichtal changed his position from the one he espoused in his youth. The physical product of that introspection is the book, Eim HaBanim Semeicha, in which he specifically retracts his previous viewpoints, and argues that the true redemption can only come if the Jewish people unite and rebuild the land of Israel. Many of his coreligionists viewed the book with skepticism, some going so far as to ban Rabbi Teichtal from their synagogues.

In the book, Rabbi Teichtal strongly criticizes the Haredim for not supporting the Zionist movement. When it was written, it was a scathing criticism of the Jewish Orthodox establishment, and Agudat Israel in particular.

The book is not quick or simple to read but it is an incredibly scholarly review of sources (most of it written from memory as the author was hiding from the Nazis with no access to his books).

See also here for a summary and here for an audio shiur.

mbloch
  • 51,726
  • 9
  • 92
  • 240
  • Are you giving this a an example of "the Haredi... stance on political Zionism prior to the establishment of the State of Israel" or as an example of how that "change[d] with the establishment of the state"? If the former, you'd do well to mention that this stance is atypical rather than "the" stance; if the latter, note that the change you mentioned took place before Israel became a country. – msh210 Nov 20 '18 at 05:21
  • 1
    Actually both as the book both criticizes the traditional haredi anti Zionist perspective and develops a new haredi pro Zionist perspective which has become more common now in so-called hardal (haredi dati leumi) circles. Agree R Teichtal change of mind came before the establishment of Israel though but still hope the answer will be of help to the OP – mbloch Nov 20 '18 at 05:25
  • This doesn't represent everyone. – chacham Nisan Nov 20 '18 at 16:22
  • I am puzzled by the downvotes. Do downvoters disagree the book is a relevant source?, don't like the book?, don't like me? :-> – mbloch Nov 20 '18 at 16:57
  • 1
    @chachamNisan clear, it is one man's perspective, but a very relevant one for those trying to understand pre-war haredi perspectives on Zionism – mbloch Nov 20 '18 at 16:58
  • @mbloch I disagree with the book being a relevant source. It does not represent the general "Haredi (Hasidic, orthodox non-Mizrachi)" view. – רבות מחשבות Nov 20 '18 at 17:09
  • @רבותמחשבות I understand, thanks for clarifying your view. But you will agree that it is rare to find one view in Judaism, 2 Jews 3 opinions. The book reflects one of these opinions. – mbloch Nov 20 '18 at 17:10
  • @mbloch true, except that this is one opinion that is very well-known to be a minority opinion... – רבות מחשבות Nov 20 '18 at 17:19
  • I downvoted. Don't get me wrong; I respect you and like you as a person(from my communications with you) because you're a nice, intelligent, and respectable person. It's just that I think the answer doesn't represent all those(or even most) of the people to which the question was directed to. No offense, intended. But(after a second look) I guess it does partially answer the question, so I will undo my vote. – chacham Nisan Nov 20 '18 at 18:22
  • @chachamNisan No problem, even if you downvoted, I was trying to understand - I like to be helpful and was trying to understand what the bug was. I also edited the answer to say this is "one". I might also be colored by the fact I was extremely impressed by the book: the scholarship of the author, his intellectual honesty, his command of sources by heart, etc. Might make a bit over enthusiastic – mbloch Nov 20 '18 at 18:24
  • Is this book available anywhere online? – El Shteiger Nov 26 '18 at 22:45
  • Where can this book be bought at a reasonable price? Any suggestions? – El Shteiger Nov 26 '18 at 22:54
  • @ElShteiger it appears to be online here (but I cannot say if it is legal) and available from Israel here and here – mbloch Nov 27 '18 at 03:56
0

please see Shu"t Avnei Nezer Yoreh Deah 454

  • 2
    Hi, could you explain or summarize? Thanks. – chacham Nisan Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
  • Rabbi Student does a great job of expressing stating and clarifying pre-war haredi perspectives on Zionism in english
    (IIRC he summerizes the Avnei Nezer) https://www.scribd.com/doc/2896972/Religious-Zionism-Debate
    – Steven Edelstein Nov 21 '18 at 20:10