17

In 2002, various news sources reported that a red heifer was found and the Temple Institute in Israel declared it kosher. Many of these sources later reported that the parah aduma was disqualified later that year, but I cannot find any information on why it was disqualified. Does anybody know why the 2002 red heifer was disqualified?

msh210
  • 73,729
  • 12
  • 120
  • 359
Daniel
  • 24,888
  • 3
  • 48
  • 148
  • It could be my computer screen, but that cow looks nothing like red. It looks like just a darker shade of brown, totally expected and common genetic variation. – A L Aug 26 '13 at 05:39
  • @AL Well it was originally accepted, so I guess it was considered to be the right color. – Daniel Aug 26 '13 at 13:17
  • I wonder on what basis they considered it to be the right color in the first place. – A L Aug 26 '13 at 19:16
  • @AL I don't know. It looks pretty red to me. I don't know exactly what color the parah aduma is supposed to be, though. – Daniel Aug 26 '13 at 19:19
  • http://www.thelakewoodscoop.com/news/2015/01/photos-is-a-local-businessmans-cow-a-parah-adumah.html – Gershon Gold Jan 15 '15 at 16:36
  • @AL 'red cows' aren't actually red like you imagine it, it is more of a brown color with red strong red tints I believe – Moshe Goldberg Jul 27 '15 at 21:46

2 Answers2

13

According to GlobalNext.org - page 5 the Para Aduma born in 2002 was disqualified as it grew 3 white hairs.

Gershon Gold
  • 139,471
  • 12
  • 231
  • 553
4

Since the link in Gershon Gold's answer no longer works and I have been unsuccessful at finding any other information online, I decided to email the Temple Institute in Jerusalem. This is a quote from the email I received back:

Previous candidates for parah adumah have been disqualified after having grown more than two non-red hairs. A parah adumah born a year ago in New Jersey was disqualified after it became pregnant and gave birth.

So apparently the 2002 parah adumah did indeed grow more than two non-red hairs.

Daniel
  • 24,888
  • 3
  • 48
  • 148