1

I've learned that the basic transmission of the oral law was: Moses > Joshua > Elders > Prophets > Great Assembly > Specific Rabbis

But this seems to run contradictory from what we'd expect from the Written Torah, which states that the Levites and Priests would be the ones teaching the people the laws and statutes of the Torah.

Leviticus 10:8-9

וַיְדַבֵּ֣ר יְהֹוָ֔ה אֶֽל־אַהֲרֹ֖ן לֵאמֹֽר׃

יַ֣יִן וְשֵׁכָ֞ר אַל־תֵּ֣שְׁתְּ ׀ אַתָּ֣ה ׀ וּבָנֶ֣יךָ אִתָּ֗ךְ בְּבֹאֲכֶ֛ם אֶל־אֹ֥הֶל מוֹעֵ֖ד וְלֹ֣א תָמֻ֑תוּ חֻקַּ֥ת עוֹלָ֖ם לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶֽם׃ וּֽלְהַבְדִּ֔יל בֵּ֥ין הַקֹּ֖דֶשׁ וּבֵ֣ין הַחֹ֑ל וּבֵ֥ין הַטָּמֵ֖א וּבֵ֥ין הַטָּהֽוֹר׃

And יהוה spoke to Aaron, saying:

Drink no wine or other intoxicant, you or your sons, when you enter the Tent of Meeting, that you may not die. This is a law for all time throughout the ages,

for you must distinguish between the sacred and the profane, and between the impure and the pure; and you must teach the Israelites all the laws which יהוה has imparted to them through Moses.

Deuteronomy 33:9-10

‏וּלְלֵוִ֣י אָמַ֔ר תֻּמֶּ֥יךָ וְאוּרֶ֖יךָ לְאִ֣ישׁ חֲסִידֶ֑ךָ אֲשֶׁ֤ר נִסִּיתוֹ֙ בְּמַסָּ֔ה תְּרִיבֵ֖הוּ עַל־מֵ֥י מְרִיבָֽה׃

הָאֹמֵ֞ר לְאָבִ֤יו וּלְאִמּוֹ֙ לֹ֣א רְאִיתִ֔יו וְאֶת־אֶחָיו֙ לֹ֣א הִכִּ֔יר וְאֶת־בָּנָ֖ו לֹ֣א יָדָ֑ע כִּ֤י שָֽׁמְרוּ֙ אִמְרָתֶ֔ךָ וּבְרִיתְךָ֖ יִנְצֹֽרוּ׃ יוֹר֤וּ מִשְׁפָּטֶ֙יךָ֙ לְיַעֲקֹ֔ב וְתוֹרָתְךָ֖ לְיִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל יָשִׂ֤ימוּ קְטוֹרָה֙ בְּאַפֶּ֔ךָ וְכָלִ֖יל עַֽל־מִזְבְּחֶֽךָ׃

‏ And of Levi he said: Let Your Thummim and Urim Be with Your faithful one, Whom You tested at Massah, Challenged at the waters of Meribah;

Who said of his father and mother, “I consider them not.” His brothers he disregarded, Ignored his own children. Your precepts alone they observed, And kept Your covenant. They shall teach Your laws to Jacob And Your instructions to Israel. They shall offer You incense to savor* And whole-offerings on Your altar.

Malachi 2:7-8

כִּֽי־שִׂפְתֵ֤י כֹהֵן֙ יִשְׁמְרוּ־דַ֔עַת וְתוֹרָ֖ה יְבַקְשׁ֣וּ מִפִּ֑יהוּ כִּ֛י מַלְאַ֥ךְ יְהֹֽוָה־צְבָא֖וֹת הֽוּא׃ וְאַתֶּם֙ סַרְתֶּ֣ם מִן־הַדֶּ֔רֶךְ הִכְשַׁלְתֶּ֥ם רַבִּ֖ים בַּתּוֹרָ֑ה שִֽׁחַתֶּם֙ בְּרִ֣ית הַלֵּוִ֔י אָמַ֖ר יְהֹוָ֥ה צְבָאֽוֹת׃

For the lips of a priest guard knowledge, And men seek rulings from his mouth; For he is a messenger of the LORD of Hosts. But you have turned away from that course: You have made the many stumble through your rulings;d you have corrupted the covenant of the Levites—said the LORD of Hosts.

From the first book (the Torah) to the last prophetic book (Malakhi) it's taken for granted that the teaching of the law and its statutes was done by the priests, and that it was the responsibility of the priests. If this is the case, why do most of the "Oral Law" chains seem to sidestep most levites and priests?

Is it possible this "sidestep" in the chain has to do with the reality that most priests were teaching that there was no oral law during the times of the Mishnah?

Aaron
  • 10,861
  • 1
  • 25
  • 62
  • 1
    Why would you assume that "toratecha" in Devarim is not inclusive of the oral Torah? – rosends Sep 22 '22 at 19:16
  • The Chizkuni on Vayikra 10:11 writes: ביד משה, the written Torah, and whence do we know about the Targum? answer: from the word להורות, “i.e. to explain the meaning of the text.” – Shmuel Sep 22 '22 at 19:36
  • @rosends I'm not saying it's not inclusive of the Oral Torah. But if it was inclusive I would expect the chain of transmission to be Moses > Joshua, Levits and Kohanim >Elders > Prophets > Men of Great Assembly – Aaron Sep 22 '22 at 19:50
  • 1
    @Aaron the problem might also be with your premise -- the Bartenura says that the subject of the transmission as delineated in Pirkei Avot 1:1 is specifically the non-laws in P"A לְפִיכָךְ הִתְחִיל הַתַּנָּא בְּמַסֶּכֶת זוֹ מֹשֶׁה קִבֵּל תּוֹרָה מִסִּינַי, לוֹמַר לְךָ שֶׁהַמִּדּוֹת וְהַמּוּסָרִים שֶׁבְּזוֹ הַמַּסֶּכְתָּא לֹא בָּדוּ אוֹתָם חַכְמֵי הַמִּשְׁנָה מִלִּבָּם, אֶלָּא אַף אֵלּוּ נֶאֶמְרוּ בְּסִינַי – rosends Sep 22 '22 at 20:00
  • @rosends So your argument is that in the chain for pirkei avot, those that received the tradition received an incomplete tradition? – Aaron Sep 23 '22 at 18:21
  • @Aaron No, the Bartenura's argument is that the listed chain of transmission refers to the transmitting specifically of the moral lessons of Pirkei Avot so that has no bearing on the transmission of anything else. – rosends Sep 23 '22 at 18:30
  • @rosends I don't think to me it matters what was transmitted in which chain. What I'm wondering is why there isn't a heavy chain of transmission of the oral law amongst the Kohanim considering the Torah text. There's discussions about Moshe and the oral law, and the elders, and the prophets and the men of the great assembly. There is not usually a discussion in how the Kohanim preserved the Oral Law throughout time. And so I'm wondering why that is considering the Tanakh as a whole gives the impression that teaching of these things would be the job of the Kohanim – Aaron Sep 23 '22 at 18:36
  • @rosends It's worth noting that Rambam's list of transmissions does lean more on Kohanim transmitting the Law. Rambam has his transmission as Moshe > Joshua and Pinchas (priest) > Elders (I assume from each tribe, so possible priests) > Eli (High Priest) > Achiah (levite) > Elisha / Elijah > Yehoyada (priest) > Prophets > Ezra – Aaron Sep 23 '22 at 18:39
  • @Aaron but you are using as your proof of the chain a list which the Bartenura says doesn't apply to other things, just to the content of Pirkei Avot. So the chain of transmission of anything else is not limited by the exclusion of kohanim in THAT list. Your expectation is that they be included in a list which isn't about laws. Maybe the list was given in P"A specifically to show that only in THIS case, they aren't included. – rosends Sep 23 '22 at 19:47
  • @rosends What other lists other than Pirkei Avot and Rambam's mishneh Torah are you aware of? But either way, I'm not so interested in the chains of transmission. A discourse in the Gemara of how the Kohanim taught the oral law would also be great to see, but I haven't heard of such a thing. I've mostly just seen polemics against the adduccees (priests) for not teaching the oral law. So that's why my question is, were the priests teachers of the oral law moving forward from Moshe? If not, why not? – Aaron Sep 23 '22 at 22:14
  • 1
    Related: https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/125761/why-moses-way-of-teaching-israel-left-yehoshuah-out-eruvin-54b – Harel13 Sep 24 '22 at 17:22

1 Answers1

1

The simple answer is that the list in Avos refers to the great leaders of the generation, the gedolei hador. The verses you cite refer to the general class of rabbis and educators, who tended to be from Shevet Levi and were therefore supported by the public in the Biblical agricultural system. But they were not necessarily the ones who were the universally recognized sages whose names were recorded for all time, although Kohanim and Levites were overrepresented in that group also.

N.T.
  • 8,653
  • 9
  • 32