1

Child marriage is a crime and is illegal by law. Yet, there are verses in Hindu texts that seem to promote it. Please explain how this is reconcilable.?

  1. पराशरस्मृति (Parāshara Smriti) 7.7-8.:

प्राप्ते तु द्वादशे वर्षे यः कन्यां न प्रयच्छति । मासि मासि रजस्तस्याः पिबन्ति पितरः स्वयम् ॥ ७ ॥ माता चैव पिता चैव ज्येष्ठो भ्राता तथैव च। त्रयस्ते नरकं यान्ति दृष्ट्वा कन्यां रजस्वलाम् ॥ ८ ॥

A man who does not give his daughter in marriage at the age of twelve. Every month the forefathers themselves drink the dust of her menstruation. ॥ 7 ॥ Mother, father and elder brother and so on. The three of them will go to hell if they see the girl who is mestruating. ॥ 8 ॥

  1. महाभारत (Mahābhārata) 13/33/14.:

त्रिंशद्वर्षो दशवर्षां भार्यां विन्देत नग्निकाम् । एकविंशतिवर्षो वा सप्तवर्षामवाप्नुयात् ।।

A man thirty years old shall marry a charming maiden of ten years old; One twenty one years old should get a damsel of seven years old.

  1. संवर्त स्मृति (Samvarta Smriti) 65-67.:

अष्टवर्षा भवेद्गौरी नववर्षा तु रोहिणी. दशवर्षा भवेत्कन्या अतः ऊर्ध्वं रजस्वला.. माता चैव पिता चैव ज्येष्ठो भ्राता तथैव च . त्रयस्ते नरकं यान्ति दृष्ट्वा कन्यां रजस्वलाम्.. तस्माद् विवाहयेत्कन्यां यावन्नर्तुमती भवेत्. विवाहो यष्टवर्षायाः कन्यायास्तु प्रशस्यते ...

At eight years old, she is Gauri and Rohini at nine years old. At ten years old, she is a girl (kanyā) and above that she is menstruating.. Mother and father and elder brother and so on, The three of them go to hell when they see a girl who is menstruating. Therefore, he should give a daughter in marriage until she remains playful. Marriage of a daughter of the age of adoration is advisable.

  • Above verses are not "child marriage", they are "girl-child marriage" to be precise. Men have to undergo gurukul education for many years and can only get married post that. "child marriage is criminal..." - this is as per constitution which isnt framed as per shastras. Shastras don't have to follow constitution it shd be the other way round – ekAntika Nov 08 '23 at 05:08
  • 1
    Child marriage was the norm throughout the world due to the fact that most people (in an era before the advent of modern medicines, proper sanitation & ample food supply) would live up only upto their 30s. So marrying off at 10s would ensure ample time for family life. However, as quality of life in Europe improved in the last 2 centuries, opinions towards child-marriage changed there, & by virtue of colonisation, those opinions became global. – অনু Nov 14 '23 at 03:34
  • @অনু - 'most people would live up only upto their 30s' - this is common nonsense myth repeated ad nauseum. there were frequent wars among kingdoms which would lead to young mean dying early.. not average natural old age deaths of people dying off when they turned 35. – ram Nov 14 '23 at 07:25
  • 2
  • It is VERY IMPORTANT to note that the ages mentioned in texts like - Mahabharata and Ramayana like epics do NOT follow biological age! But rather initiation age (dwija age), where the age is supposed to become 0. For example, a very quoted verse from Ramayana in support of child marriage is Rama married Sita at the age of 6, should be noted that it is NOT possible to have marriage until dwija is given, hence the given age of Sita during the marriage becomes 6 + 13 = 19, as per Vedas! There is NO significance of biological age after dwija. – User 29449 Nov 14 '23 at 16:05