1

Does apauruṣeyā when applied to Vedas just mean 'not of human origin' leaving the possibility that a superhuman being could have authored them?

Or do different schools of Hindu philosophy interpret the word differently?

Did anyone belonging to Nyāya school ever use this expression to indicate the Vedas were authored by God or do they have a different word for it?

Shashaank
  • 1,248
  • 5
  • 36
Say No To Censorship
  • 30,811
  • 17
  • 131
  • 257
  • I'm in doubt, how this question is different from the following:|| https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/30284/why-do-vedas-have-%c5%9b%c4%81kh%c4%81s-are-all-of-them-apauru%e1%b9%a3ey%c4%81?r=SearchResults, ¦¦ https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/29540/was-kum%c4%81rila-bha%e1%b9%ad%e1%b9%ada-the-first-to-argue-that-the-vedas-were-apaurus%cc%a3eya-authorle?r=SearchResults, ¦¦ https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/29534/which-schools-of-indian-philosophy-consider-the-vedas-to-be-apauru%e1%b9%a3eya-authorle?r=SearchResults. || Please resolve! – Vivikta Apr 06 '21 at 01:59
  • https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/45000/what-are-the-arguments-of-nyaya-and-samkhya-against-the-eternity-of-the-vedas?r=SearchResults – Vivikta Apr 06 '21 at 01:59
  • This is a question about the term apauruṣeyā itself and how it's used by different schools. That's why the 'terminology' tag. @Vivikta – Say No To Censorship Apr 06 '21 at 02:16
  • apauruṣeyā cannot mean no author because the Vedas clearly use I, intent and I made x prayer. Also, they refer to people saying things, which cannot be perpetually true (definitely false at creation). Although the author is one with the Veda and the thing they are trying to tell you is apauruṣeyā (minus what is inside the quotes). – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Nov 04 '21 at 14:43

2 Answers2

1

The Nyaya school doesn't consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya but instead consider it to be āptavacana or words that are sourced from a credible person - īśvara.

Source: Section 7 (śabda) from Tarka Sangraha and it's commentary Dipika.

hashable
  • 3,645
  • 18
  • 33
0

The Nyaya school is astika, orthodox, in the sense that they accepted the vedas. At the very start of the Bhasha Pariccheda with Siddhanta-Muktavali by Visvanatha-Nyaya-Pancanana (translation by Swami Madhavananda) the opening invocation is from the vedas. And in his opening commentary Visvanatha-Nyaya-Pancanana states:

...The invocation there is made in apprehension of an obstacle; for such is the practice among the cultured. Nor can it be urged that if an invocation is fruitless, the Vedas inculcating it cease to be authoritative; for the Vedas only say that if there be an obstacle, it will be removed (in that way). Hence although as expiatory ceremony that is performed for an act wrongly apprehended is futile, yet it does not nullify the authoritativeness of the Vedas that teach it...

And at the end of the commentary on this opening invocation, Visvanatha-Nyaya-Pancanana quotes Rig Veda X.lxxx.3 'One shining Being generating heaven and earth' and Mundakya Upanishad I.i.1 'The creator of the universe, the protector of the universe'

And as they accept the vedas, one only need look at the concluding verses of several of the Upanishads that they are directly from Brahman (for example Brhadaranyaka Upanishad VI.v.3, and Chandogya Upanishad VIII.15.1).

Swami Vishwananda
  • 24,140
  • 2
  • 34
  • 78