12

In Hindu traditional calender Their are 12 months (मास)

Chaitra (चैत्र), Vaisakha (वैशाख), Jyaistha (जेष्ठ), Asadha (आषाढ), Sravana (श्रावण), Bhadrapada (भाद्रपद), Asvina (अश्विन), Kartika (कार्तिक), Agrahayana (अग्रहायन), Pausa (पौष), Magha (माघ), and Phalguna (फाल्गुन).

Who have first given the names to Months?

What is the meanig of each Month's name?

Are their any stories related to these Names?

Pandya
  • 26,175
  • 10
  • 99
  • 243
SwiftPushkar
  • 32,135
  • 6
  • 88
  • 156

2 Answers2

10

These 12 months are derived from the name of nakshtras. As I discuss in my answer here, the names of nakshtras are itself stated in Atharva Veda. In a particular month there is high probability of occurring full moon in particular nakshtra. Of course it may not occur exactly but it occurs near.

Maharshi Upamanyu in Vyaviya Samhita chapter 7 of Shiva Mahapurana also mentions relation between name of month and its relation with Nakshatras:

पौषे पुष्यनक्षत्रे कुर्यान्नीराजनं विभोः ॥ ७.२,२८.६ माघे मघाख्ये नक्षत्रे प्रदद्याद्घृतकंबलम् ॥ ७.२,२८.६ फाल्गुने चोत्तरान्ते वै प्रारभेत महोत्सवम् ॥ ७.२,२८.७ चैत्रे चित्रापौर्णमास्यां दोलां कुर्याद्यथाविधि ॥ ७.२,२८.७ वैशाख्यां तु विशाखायां कुर्यात्पुष्पमहालयम् ॥ ७.२,२८.८ ज्येष्ठे मूलाख्यनक्षत्रे शीतकुम्भं प्रदापयेत् ॥ ७.२,२८.८ आषाढे चोत्तराषाढे पवित्रारोपणं तथा ॥ ७.२,२८.९ (Shiva Purana chapter 7, Vyayaviya Samhita)

In the Pushya nakshatra in the month of Poush. Magha nakshatra in the month of Magha. Uttara (falguni) in month of Falguna. In the month of Chaitra on the full-moon day Chitra nakshatra. Vishakha nakshatra in the month of Vaisakha. Mula nakshatra in the month of Jestha (which is near Jyestha nakshatra). Uttarashadha nakshatra in the month of Ashadha.

The above reference is clear to establish that month names are directly related with Nakshatra names. Especially by the word "चैत्रे चित्रापौर्णमास्यां", Maharshi Upamanyu directly tells that in the month of Chaitra when Purnima is in Chitra.

On the basis of this 15 nakshtras were choosen and months were named on the basis of that name. For eg. There is high probability of occurring full moon in or near Visakha nakshtra in Vaisakha and so that full moon is termed as Vaisakh Poornima and the month is named Vaisakh. The above Shiva Purana chapter in some places differs with the name of Nakshatra in some places, like it says Mula in Jestha, but if we look closely Mula and Jyestha nakshatra are close, so if full moon occurs on Mula, it is closer to Jyestha, and so on.

So, the months are derived from these nakshtras:

Chitra Nakshtra = Chaitra month

Visakha Nakshtra = Vaisakha month

Jyestha Nakshtra = Jyestha month

Purva Aashaadha, Uttara Aashaadha Nakshtras = Aasadha month

Sravana Nakshtra = Sraavana month

Uttara Bhaadrapada, Poorva Bhaadrapada Nakshtras = Bhadra month

Asvini Nakshtra = Asvina month

Krittika nakshtra = Kaartika month

Mrigashira nakshtra = Maarghasira month

Pushya nakshtra = Pausa month

Maghaa nakshtra = Magha month

Uttara Phalguni, Purva Phalguni nakshtras = Phalguna month

The full moon either occurs in those nakshatras or near those nakshatras of a particular month and hence these months derive their name from those nakshatras. Also, refer to this Kamakoti article for further information on how the names of these Months got changed across various places and times.

Tezz
  • 48,448
  • 9
  • 230
  • 344
  • 1
    Got your point. Also would like to know, whether these names are just have gramatical origin or have some specific meaning, regarding time of the year or season etc. – SwiftPushkar Jul 01 '16 at 12:41
  • 3
    @SwiftPushkar the names of these constellation are also described in Atharva veda samhita as I discuss in my answer here... http://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/7465/is-the-practice-of-kundalis-matching-part-of-the-core-hindu-doctrine/11716#11716 so, names are already fixed by Vedas... The personified nakshtras took birth as daughter of Daksha Prajapati and were married with personified moon... so, Moon is considered Lord of Nakshtras... – Tezz Jul 01 '16 at 12:47
  • 1
    @Tezz there is no such proabability. Can you please give the proof for such probability? – Profile name Jun 27 '22 at 18:34
  • 1
    @Tezz how near is near? Like how far can the full moon go from the Nakshatra and still the month can be named after it.? – Profile name Jun 27 '22 at 18:35
3

The question is actually clearly answered by @Tezz. But there is another question from the user @optimus which not only concerns about how the names are derived but also depends on how the calander works.

The Shri-Surya-Siddhanta has a perticular rule to name the month. It places Nakshatras in group of three or two under a perticular month (See table). We name the month Whenever moon becomes full in a nakshatra of that perticular group.

This rule is presented in the 14th chapter of the Surya-Siddhanta.

नाक्षत्रमानम्‌- भचक्रभ्रमणं नित्यं नाक्षत्रं दिनमुच्यते । नक्षत्रनाम्ना मासास्तु ज्ञेया: पर्वान्तयोगत:॥ १५ ॥ कार्तिक्यादिषु संयोगे कृत्तिकादि द्वयं द्वयम्‌ । अन्त्योपान्त्यौ पञ्चमश्च त्रिधा मासत्रयं स्मृतम्‌ ॥ १६ ॥

The name of the month is to be known by the Nakshatra which is in conjunction with the moon at the time of Purnima-aanta (the end of Purnima). For the month's like Kartika etc. Group together nakshatras in order of twos starting with Krittika, however Group Nakshatras into three's for the Last, second last and fifth month.

I.e.

Sr. No. Nakshatras in which Full moon ends Month
1 Krittika, Rohini Kartika
2 Mrigashira, Ardra Margasirsa
3 Punarvasu, Pushya Pausa
4 Ashlesha, Magha Maghaa
5 Purva Phalguni, Uttara Phalguni, Hasta Phalgun
6 Chitra, Swati Caitra
7 Vishaka, Anuradha Vaisakha
8 Jyeshta, Mula Jyestha
9 Purva Ashadha, Uttara Ashadha Ashadha
10 Shravana, Dhanishta Sravana
11 Shatabhishak, Purva Bhadrapada, Uttara Bhadrapada Bhadrapada
12 Revati, Ashwini, Bharni Ashvina

But wait! try checking the calendar for a few months and you will see a violation of the above rule. For example, 8 Nov 2022 The full moon ends with Bharni however the month is named Kartika.

Why? In the translation of Shri-Surya-Siddhanta by Ebenezer Burgess, he writes

...owing to the incommensurability of the times of revolution of the sun and moon, as also to the revolution of the moon's line of apsides, full moon is liable to occur in succession in all the asterisms, and at all points of the zodiac; so that although, at the time when, the system of names for the months originated and established itself, they were doubtless strictly applicable, they would not long continue to be so....

However, today the name of the months entirely dependent upon the solar months. And they no longer regulate according to nakshatra of full moon. In the book,  Indian Calender by Robert sewell and Sankara Balkrishna Dikshit, they write

  1. But the stars or groups of stars which give their names to the months are not at equal distances from one another; and as this circumstance,—together with the phenomenon of the moon's apparent varying daily motion, and the fact that her synodic differs from her sidereal revolution—prevents the moon from becoming full year after year in the same nakshatra...
  1. It is clear that this practice, though it was natural in its origin and though it was ingeniously modified in later years, must often have occasioned considerable confusion ; and so we find that the months gradually ceased to have their names regulated according to the conjunction of full moons and nakshatras, and were habitually named after the solar months in which they occurred.

The general rule has been that that amanta lunar month in which the Mesha sankranti occurs, is called Chaitra, and the rest in succession.

This is why we don't see the moon to go full in exactly that perticular Nakshatra but near to it. This picture will continue to deviate more and more.


To conclude, the names got their derivation from the Nakshatras. But due to small changes in the motion up in the sky, the names don't align well with the way they are derived.

Second
  • 2,832
  • 1
  • 10
  • 37
  • 1
    OMG how did you even get this info. Excellent answer. Thank you so much – Profile name Jul 03 '22 at 18:38
  • You have said "The general rule has been that that amanta lunar month in which the Mesha sankranti occurs, is called Chaitra, and the rest in succession." But then what is the old and new rule for Adhika Masa? If we go by the old Nakshatra system only Phalguna, Bhadrapada and Ashwina will habe Adhika masa as they span 40 Deg. The rest of masas will span 26.66 Deg. So an idea about the old and new method to calculate Adhika Masa? – Profile name Jul 03 '22 at 18:40
  • @optimus If no sankranti falls between two Purnima we get a Adhika Masa. While if two sankranti fall, the entire month is dropped. Diffrent systems have Diffrent ways to add them. It has been given here : https://archive.org/details/indian-calendar-r.-sewell-sankara-balakrishna-dikshit/page/n39/mode/2up – Second Jul 04 '22 at 04:44
  • I dont think there was a connection between Adhika Masa and Nakshatras in first place. A complete lunar/solar Calender would not require them. Only luni-solar Calenders. It's a new information for me to have Adhika Masa in phalgun, Bhadrapada and Ashwina alone. As normally I guess phalgun never has a Adhika Masa. – Second Jul 04 '22 at 04:47
  • the Sankranthi method is a new method. It is not an old method. For example when Purnima falls in Shatabisha, Purvabhadra and Uttarabhadra we call it Bhadrapada right? Now what happens wheb one full moon falls in Shatabhisha abd the next full moon falls in Uttarabhadra?? Both consecutive months cannot be Bhadrapada, automatically one should become Adhika Bhadrapada. – Profile name Jul 04 '22 at 05:03
  • the Sankranti idea that you gave is a new modern idea, because it requires the 12 rashis. But the 12 rashis is not present in the original Vedic Calendar. No mention of Rashis is mentioned in Vedas, Vedanga Jyothisha and even Mahabharata. It is only present in Siddhanta and Puranas. So how was Adhika masa calculated in Vedic calendar when the Nakshatra system was used. – Profile name Jul 04 '22 at 05:05
  • Also is this the same definition of months used in Vedic calendar? – Profile name Jul 04 '22 at 05:52
  • 1
    Yes, sankranti method is the morden method, all the calendars right now work on that. We can only speculate that Adhika Masa occurs as result of full moon occurring consecutively in the same group. Vedanga jyotisha is a very difficult text, the vedic calendar was probably a 19 year calendar with 7 intercalary months that allows us to have 18 years of 371 days and the 19-th year with 372 days. I have no idea of how nakshatras fit into that picture. @Optimus – Second Jul 04 '22 at 09:28
  • yes this is a huge problem. My question is if we habe three Nakshatras in one month, all the Adhika Masas will occur in them, because their large span. My main question is what happens when two full moon occurs in Shatabhisha and Uttara Bhadra, what's the name of those two months?? – Profile name Jul 04 '22 at 09:46
  • If we go strictly by the rule the months will have the same name. There is also no mention to why they are grouped that way, and any way no one will be bothered about it. But understand that, the two similar months cannot be termed as Adhika because the whole point of Adhik masa is to bring a alignment between solar and lunar months. – Second Jul 04 '22 at 13:06
  • that's actually a famous myth. Adhika Masa need not be for aligning it with Solar and Lunar calendar, if they simply count Adhika Masa when two full moons fall in the same group the calendars will automatically align. Adhika Masa is very important as we are trying to date Mahabharat, Adhika masa will change the date of the war, I had a lengthy debate online on twitter. So when two months fall in thw same group what should be done?? The first will be Adhika and the second will be Nija. This has to be the only way, as far as I can think. – Profile name Jul 04 '22 at 16:01
  • Yes, that can be the only way. @optimus see this: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=fTbyDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA127#v=onepage&q&f=false – Second Jul 04 '22 at 16:57
  • 1
    So I was correct?? bro how do you even search these books. Thanks a lot. – Profile name Jul 04 '22 at 17:36
  • the book you have link is a sample, which hides important 114 page. If you have the link for full book can you give it? – Profile name Jul 05 '22 at 17:23
  • 1
    @optimus I tried searching around for full version, but did not find it. – Second Jul 06 '22 at 04:00