106

The IEEE holds yearly elections for senior positions in its societies. Every member of the IEEE has the right to vote in these elections, including me. My advisor, however, has candidates who, for one reason or the other, he supports and wants to get elected.

The issue is that he is forcing all of his students to vote for his candidates. Voting is done online. He even asks his Assistant Professor to personally stand next to the students and watch them vote on the specified candidates.

This makes me extremely uncomfortable, as I find it morally incorrect. However, my professor is in a position of power over the students and I am afraid of standing against him and losing my graduate course and scholarship.

Has anyone gone through something similar? What should I do?

psmears
  • 188
  • 6
GoldenLizard
  • 973
  • 2
  • 6
  • 6
  • 3
    Regarding your situation, you are right to afraid of being out of the game, by loosing your scholarship.Do you have the chance to not vote in this case ? or delegating your right to another person ? I am not sure if this one would resolve the unethical side of behavior of your advisor but at least, you can be outside of an unethical issue. – optimal control May 30 '16 at 13:41
  • 34
    Is this the only 'bad side' of your advisor? – Fábio Dias May 30 '16 at 14:13
  • 96
    How far along are you in your studies? Consider switching advisors. Someone who is this unethical in one area is probably unethical in others. –  May 30 '16 at 14:23
  • 3
    Vote is not mandatory in IEEE, but the Assistant Professor is checking people, making sure they are voting. My advisor has other bad sides, but they are pretty minor, specially compared to this. I am halfway done with my Master's Studies, but changing advisors would be risky, since the chance of me keeping the scholarship is small (and I study in a different country from where my family lives, I need the scholarship to stay here). – GoldenLizard May 30 '16 at 14:29
  • 3
    It is possible the advisor is under pressure by someone else, let's not judge too fast. Anyway, don't do anything for the moment, it'll be too harmful for your carrier. But try to avoid to vote, and speak later with the advisor that you are uneasy because you think that was unethical. – Gautier C May 30 '16 at 14:36
  • 28
    If you vote while the professor is watching, he'll know who you vote for. If you vote from home / some other computer, you can vote according to your conscience. Then when the professor demands you vote, the system either won't let you vote again, or it'll change your vote (in which case you can change it again, from another location). This doesn't prevent backlash against you obviously, but it is a way to exclude yourself from the unethical behavior. – Ben Voigt May 30 '16 at 15:31
  • 88
    What most amazes me about this question is that anyone cares enough about a professional society election to pull such nonsense. In my experience, the biggest problem with professional society elections is getting even one person to run for each office, and the second biggest problem is getting a quorum of people to vote for that unopposed candidate. – Nate Eldredge May 30 '16 at 16:28
  • 1
    @NateEldredge: I guess some people are just going to be mindlessly authoritarian about everything by nature. – Daniel R. Collins May 30 '16 at 17:46
  • 78
    Don't walk. Run. – JeffE May 30 '16 at 21:27
  • 16
    This might be a bad idea, so please please don't just do it, but the first thing that comes to my mind is: From an anonymous mail address, send the IEEE a link to this question along with the name of your institution. They'll surely have an interest in "correcting" the situation, and you can hide in the (hopefully) masses of other affected students. If there's something written here that could be used to identify you, make an edit to remove that information and flag the question for moderator attention, explaining that you'd like it to be removed from the edit history, too. – Daniel Jour May 30 '16 at 21:39
  • 2
    @DanielJour: I don't see how that would help. What do you think IEEE could do with that information? It's not enough to identify the faculty member responsible, and even if it were, they're surely not going to censure or discipline them on the basis of an anonymous complaint. – Nate Eldredge May 30 '16 at 22:02
  • 3
    This entire story makes me cringe. It's a gross abuse of power by an authority figure. Psychologically, that can be very damaging to you and the other students. – End Anti-Semitic Hate May 31 '16 at 02:13
  • 11
    Jumping to the reference text, IEEE's code of ethics: http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html this seems to be a severe violation of 2, 9, and 10. – user2943160 May 31 '16 at 02:24
  • 2
    @NateEldredge It's a violation of their code of ethics. As soon as they get that hint they're able to a) decide whether and how they protect this code and more importantly b) do the necessary investigations. It's not OP's job to do the later. (You aren't supposed to investigate yourself if someone broke the law and - for example - stole your car, are you?) – Daniel Jour May 31 '16 at 05:34
  • 4
    @DanielJour: I don't think your analogy is apt. If your car is stolen, you don't have to investigate yourself, but you do have to make a report to the police, identify the car as best you can, and be available to testify (non-anonymously) if requested. You can't just send the police an anonymous note saying "hey guys, a car was stolen somewhere in this town". – Nate Eldredge May 31 '16 at 05:51
  • 2
    In other words, I am skeptical that an anonymous tip, which doesn't precisely identify the alleged culprit, will be sufficient to trigger an investigation. – Nate Eldredge May 31 '16 at 05:55
  • 2
    Given the number of voting members, I don't think your votes will be significance enough. Having said that, if I were you I would send an email to the IEEE warning of votes rigging. – Prof. Santa Claus May 31 '16 at 10:28
  • Can you inconspicuously choose not to vote? – Noctis Skytower May 31 '16 at 13:22
  • I would just vote for whomever I wanted, assistant or not standing behind my shoulder. If he dares to protest, ask him to direct his complaint to the university's ethics department. It's no one's business who you vote for, voting is the basis of the democratic process. No one can force you to vote one way or another, it is by definition a personal choice. – Drunken Code Monkey May 31 '16 at 22:25
  • 2
    @NateEldredge The IEEE is more than just a 'professional society' - it has a rather large standards group, which maintains the official standards for Ethernet, WiFi, Firewire, POSIX, some forms of public-key cryptography, and others. – SomeoneSomewhereSupportsMonica Jun 01 '16 at 10:41
  • How is he forcing you? This is an obvious ethical breach and should be discussed with your adviser first then reported if everything is not cleared up. – Sophie Gairo May 31 '16 at 20:48
  • @NateEldredge IEEE takes itself far more seriously than most professional societies. Amusingly so at times, annoyingly so at others. – reirab Jun 01 '16 at 21:24
  • 1
    We were contacted by someone at the IEEE regarding this issue. If you'd like to contact them directly, GoldenLizard, email me at abby@stackexchange.com and I'll put you in touch. – hairboat Jun 14 '16 at 19:29

8 Answers8

71

Allow me to hypothesize a different tack from most of the other answers: Simply don't engage in this issue at all. As my mentor said once, "You constantly get institutional demands for some action, in some cases it's best to ignore them, and you'll find that many just go away."

This request is so incredibly unethical, and also so completely orthogonal to your responsibilities as a graduate student, that it's hard for me to imagine your advisor spending time on tracking you down and taking revenge over it. If you think you might receive more pressure later on (e.g., I've sadly cracked under such circumstances), go ahead and cast the online vote in the privacy of your own home, and then later on say, "Oh sorry, I got a notification and cast the vote immediately."

The request is so inflammatory that I don't see any use to "politely having an open discussion with your advisor". I think that only opens the door for defensiveness and retaliation. As wildly unacceptable as it is, I don't see it as being a good use of your time tracking down where to lodge a complaint over this matter (which your advisor seems canny enough to avoid documenting except verbally, so it would be just your word against his, according to comments above).

At least consider the null action as a possibility.

Daniel R. Collins
  • 36,531
  • 13
  • 99
  • 143
  • 16
    null action imply that you agree. In France, we got this proverb, that I will try to translate : "saying nothing, agree to everything". – Gautier C May 31 '16 at 06:23
  • 3
    @GautierC: On the other hand, consider: Schnee, Emily, and Enakshi Bose. "Parents Don't Do Nothing: Reconceptualizing Parental Null Actions as Agency." School Community Journal 20.2 (2010): 91. "A null action is not synonymous with parents doing nothing or being disinterested or disengaged in their children’s learning. Rather, we see null actions as expressions of agency that reflect specific parental interests and intentions that lie behind an apparent absence of parental action..." – Daniel R. Collins May 31 '16 at 15:37
  • 15
    @GautierC Null action stemming from indecisiveness is agreement. Null action stemming from decision is not. You still have responsibility for what you do and don't, but its flavour is markedly different. I suggest Brecht's story of Mr. Keuner, "Methods to counter violence" (or whatever it is called in English). It's a very short story and illustrates the point much better than I could hope to do. +1 for the answer. – Captain Emacs May 31 '16 at 15:42
  • 1
    @CaptainEmacs, could you link that please? I'd like to read it, and I'm guessing it's in a non-English language. – FuriousFolder May 31 '16 at 16:20
  • @FuriousFolder I did not find a free non-English version. Not sure about the copyright status, so I'd rather not link. The title is "Maßnahmen gegen die Gewalt". – Captain Emacs May 31 '16 at 17:35
  • @GautierC "Silence is consent" –  May 31 '16 at 17:57
  • 5
  • https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.satzsucher.de/index.php%3Fid%3D27&prev=search

    @CaptainEmacs Found it! :)

    – FuriousFolder May 31 '16 at 19:35
  • 1
    @MonkeyZeus love your sentence ! :) – Gautier C May 31 '16 at 21:37
  • @GautierC: How is that proverb expressed in the French language, exactly? – Daniel R. Collins Jun 04 '16 at 18:02
  • 2
    Qui ne dit mot consent ^^ – Gautier C Jun 05 '16 at 09:05
  • ^ As a side note, my French partner has never heard of that proverb. – Daniel R. Collins Jan 03 '18 at 15:30
40

This is extremely unethical. Do you have any proof of what he asked for ? If he can't check for who you did vote, there is no problem for you (but the moral problem is still here), you might just say you did it alone, without the Assistant Professor. (You do it, then that's it.)

The ethical way would be to inform your university. But that is really dangerous. You might want to wait until the end of your graduate program. It is hard to find a good way to solve this problem without harming you.

In your position, I would certainly tell the teacher that I don't want to do it without a good reason and the certitude that is a good choice, but if you're not confident you can't handle the consequences, don't do it.

Gautier C
  • 898
  • 6
  • 15
  • 1
    Thanks for the suggestion! I believe that discussing this with the professor is a good idea, but I am tending to not pushing the situation to much, and filing a complaint after my studies are gone, not at the university but at IEEE. As for proofs, unfortunately I only have one email where he says who his favorite candidate is, but all the pressure is done personally or by the Assistant Professor, so I have no proof of that. – GoldenLizard May 30 '16 at 14:35
  • 9
    an email is enough. Store it somewhere. As I said in another comment, try to ask him why he thinks it is so important, and why it is the good choice, etc... Maybe there is a real reason (who said "politics" ?!) – Gautier C May 30 '16 at 14:38
  • 6
    @GoldenLizard I'd suggest contacting both. The University may have ethical rules/procedures which they can bring to bear that the IEEE can not, and vice versa. So if one is powerless/unwilling to act, the other might be able to. – R.M. May 30 '16 at 18:47
  • do not wait! Don't do that or you will perpetrate this and you will be part of this scheme. Also use your cellphone to record their live voices, a suggestion over an email will not hold any power. – Herman Toothrot May 31 '16 at 11:57
  • 2
    Recording is viewview as a crime in a lot of countries, including some USA states. And pushing him to crush his career because of a minor impact ethical problem is not what I want. As I said, going proactive right now on this problem will lead to a personal disaster. – Gautier C May 31 '16 at 11:59
  • 2
    I disagree that having "one email where he says who his favorite candidate is, but all the pressure is done personally or by the Assistant Professor" is "enough" for evidence of malfeasance. It's fine to make a recommendation or suggestion. It sounds like this advisor is very cunning about knows to keep the actual offense undocumented. I think it will be extremely hard to make any accusation stick; he's already done advance work in covering his tracks. – Daniel R. Collins May 31 '16 at 15:41
21

It would be even more powerful to inform the IEEE (if the OP can muster the proof that this coercion is going on). But, unfair as it is, it will probably damage the OP's career irreparably. Utterly despicable - I heard such stuff only from hearsay (or from infamous examples in 20th century history). Collect evidence if you can, and, at some point in the future you may be in the position to dispense justice.

Captain Emacs
  • 47,698
  • 12
  • 112
  • 165
  • 11
    He is forcing all of his students to vote for specific candidates. I am not sure if the votes at IEEE are secret. If they are not, the IEEE could check if there is really a statistically significant difference in the votes of this students and others. They could do this even if they get an anonymous complaint. Obviously, this only works if there are enough students so the professor doesn't know who complained. But I assume there are, because otherwise it wouldn't make much sense to force them to vote. – Josef May 30 '16 at 14:10
  • 1
    They have the name of everyone, since you're supposed to be elligible to vote. But I'm not sure if they would check, since it is supposed to be anonymous. – Gautier C May 30 '16 at 14:34
  • 1
    Thanks for the answer! I should inform the IEEE, I think that would be the right to do. And I would feel more comfortable if I could do it after my studies are done, so I am in a safer position. We are 30 students in the lab, and I believe all are being coerced into following the professor's vote. Not sure if this would be proof enough though. – GoldenLizard May 30 '16 at 14:38
  • 3
    @GautierC: Just because they have everyone's names does not mean they can tell who voted for whom. – tomasz May 30 '16 at 15:03
  • @GoldenLizard It is not clear to which extent one can retroactively reconstruct what happened, but perhaps it may trigger a mechanism being put in place that will prevent such things in the future. You take care, and it is a wise decision to wait until you have finished, and then can remove yourself from the realm of power of this person. – Captain Emacs May 30 '16 at 15:12
  • 8
    @Josef even if all the students vote for the same candidate, it isn't an indication of foul play. All of them could have met the same guy in a visit to the lab and discover how amazing he is. – Davidmh May 30 '16 at 15:18
  • 1
    Awful advice. What you are basically saying is that the OP should either do nothing to prevent this voting irregularity from taking place, or destroy his/her career in the process. – Daffy Punk May 30 '16 at 18:33
  • 2
    @DaffyPunk You seem to have an idea how to both prevent this voting irregularity and preserve his career? Then let us know your solution. Note that also the other responders emphasise the direct danger to the OP's career, also in other paths taken. – Captain Emacs May 30 '16 at 20:20
  • As I said before. The OP can write an anonymous letter to the advisor to object to the coercion. At least the advisor will think twice before continuing with this course of action and will get an opportunity to correct his behavior! – Daffy Punk May 30 '16 at 20:26
  • 2
    @DaffyPunk I must have missed that comment of yours - I do not see it in the exchange (was it deleted?). But, independent of that, I think writing an anonymous letter to the advisor has the distinct possibility of both destroying OP's career and not having any effect. In fact, it can backfire and appear like a blackmail attempt (and yes, the OP will be found out). I agree my solution landscape is highly suboptimal, but I do think that yours has even potential to have much worse repercussions. Compared to that an ombudsman would be preferable, even if still quite risky. – Captain Emacs May 30 '16 at 20:38
  • Yes, it was. I find your claim to have "missed it" disingenuous since you made exactly the same comments as now. Wrt your first statement, I contend that you have no basis to claim that the OP will be "found out", since it is an entire group of students who are being coerced. Wrt you second statement, I highly doubt that this can be construed as blackmail. I ask again, under which law would this be considered blackmail? – Daffy Punk May 30 '16 at 21:09
  • 2
    @DaffyPunk I am sorry, but I absolutely do not understand your point about me being disingenuous. I have not seen your comment about anonymous write-in anywhere else in this thread; I specifically searched for Daffy Punk. Did you post under a different name? I am happy to be corrected if I am wrong; but insinuations I will not let stand. As for the second point: I believe that, with sufficient effort, it could be reconstructed who sent the anonymous mail; people have been fired on weaker evidence than that. – Captain Emacs May 30 '16 at 23:24
  • 2
    And for an adviser that is prepared to tamper with a voting process one needs to take into account that they will leave no stone unturned to find the sender. I am surprised at your confidence in rejecting that possibility. Finally, if we speak about misunderstandings, I said this "can appear as a blackmail attempt". I didn't say it would be "considered blackmail". A slight, but important difference. In any case, I will not convince you, and, with your very strong assumptions, you do not convince me; but hopefully the OP can profit from the discussion. – Captain Emacs May 30 '16 at 23:25
  • @DaffyPunk Addendum: I remember vaguely having responded to a write-in comment earlier, but I wasn't aware of it being in this thread or you being the author (I am afraid I was multitasking, this is what it does to your memory ;-). If that was the case, my apologies. At least, the fact that I wrote the same things as now show that I am consistent in my opinions :-) – Captain Emacs May 30 '16 at 23:33
  • The possibility is there but I highly doubt an advisor would risk his career even more (push his luck any further) just to advance someone else's career. If the advisor does, by some turn of events, find out the identity of the OP, all of the normal recourses will still be at the OP's disposal. – Daffy Punk May 30 '16 at 23:34
  • @CaptainEmacs Well, we all have our senior moments every now and then – Daffy Punk May 30 '16 at 23:36
  • 1
    @DaffyPunk the advisor just has to narrow down the list of suspects to a manageable number and fire them all. We are dealing with someone manifestly unethical, that probably knows what he is doing is wrong, and doesn't care. – Davidmh May 31 '16 at 12:12
  • @Davidmh Fair point. – Daffy Punk May 31 '16 at 12:16
  • @Josef How anonymous can it be though, there is only a limited amount of students this professor has. – bubakazouba Jun 02 '16 at 23:57
  • @bubakazouba there are 30 students. I doubt the professor would risk to punish all 30 people. If he would do that, it's certain someone would complain/report him! – Josef Jun 06 '16 at 07:19
15

After forwarding a link to this posting to the IEEE Elections Committee, I received the reply below:

Thank you for the reference. We had concerns of this sort presented to us in the past and we are aware of this issue. We are working on a reporting mechanism of such infractions but, as you can imagine, it is not straightforward.

If you have answering privileges on the site where the question was posted, I would be grateful if you directed the student to write to me (Moshe Kam, Chair of IEEE Election Oversight Committee, kam@njit.edu). The intricate requirements of the site where the question was posed necessitate that I gain "reputation points" first before I can answer the student directly. I am a member of the site (under my name, Moshe Kam) but can't get to the person who posed the question.

Regards,

Moshe Kam, Ph.D., P.E.

Dean, Newark College of Engineering

New Jersey Institute of Technology

University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102-1982

Email: kam@njit.edu

Alternate Email: m.kam@ieee.org

Paul
  • 577
  • 2
  • 9
  • 1
    The question requires 10 reputation points to answer because it attracted a series of "answers" that weren't answers, thus meriting "protected" status to prevent further non-answers. Thanks for passing along this answer from Dr. Kam. – ff524 Jun 06 '16 at 03:13
13

First I would suggest against complaining too loudly against your adviser in public. When bad things happen they flow downhill and you don't want to be a target.

Second, don't "tell the university" whatever that means. What you want to do is find a specific person at the university called the ombudsman. His or her job is to act as advocate for students in weird situations and also deal with administration issues. If you prefer to be completely silent and comply then that is probably also a correct choice. But if you want to change the situation, the ombudsman is the person in the university that can be most directly said to be working for the students. I would take his advice, whether to be silent or to stand up seriously because he knows not only the theoretical best thing to do but also the history of the campus you are at, and in your case, unfortunately, "whether it will work" is tied heavily into "whether you will receive fallout".

sf_jeff
  • 231
  • 1
  • 2
9

Walk, don't run, away. What your advisor is doing is obviously ridiculously unethical, especially considering how inconsequential the election is. Unfortunately, I would caution you against switching advisors without first ensuring that you'll have a safe landing. Honestly, it is worth putting up with something as petty and dishonest as this voting scheme in order to secure your degree and future career; academia really is that competitive. You should switch advisors; someone willing to act that unethical on something that trivial would presumably be willing to do worse on things that do matter. Just make sure that you don't do so hastily or without protecting your own career.

anomaly
  • 1,447
  • 14
  • 25
7

Let's start from the bottom line. Regardless of anything else, don't vote for his/her candidates. If push comes to shove, remember you're an academic and an IEEE member and you have a moral responsibility to your community which comes before spoiling your relations with your advisor or even your personall career advisement. Unless you are blackmailed with threats of physical violence, obliging your advisor on this is completely intolerable morally.

Now let me make some suggestions you might consider regarding how to fend off this forced drowning in the sea of turpitude.

  • Talk about this with your fellow slaves, umm, I mean, Ph.D. candidates of that advisor. While resisting your advisor alone is dangerous, doing it as a group is less so (although there would still be risks). Also, if you're all coordinated, and something is done anonymously by one of you, your advisor can't know.
  • Like others have suggested, gather iron-clad hard evidence, as much as you can. Get him to email you about it, get him to talk about it while you record him on your cell phone, then transcribe what was said, etc. Save copies of this evidence off campus, in several places where he is unlikely to reach. Remember a person like that is not beyond accusing you of fabricating accusations if this becomes public knowledge. @Stilez mentioned this in the context of contacting the IEEE, but evidence is important regardless, and you should get it before or in conjuction with anything else you do, not later.
  • You mentioned power relations. Are the graduate researchers in your university unionized? If they are, then you are probably in luck. Go to the more seriously active union officials (at the faculty level or the university level; it's not always the head of the union who's the most trustworthy and militant on these matters), ask for their help and explain you've got evidence. If they are not completely spineless, they will have your back in the sense of being willing to go very far if you are harmed in any way - public protests and even a strike until you are restored to previous employment conditions in research and teaching. And it will not come to that, since if a union delegation pays a visit to your advisor, telling them they have evidence of his coersion attempts and will not hesitate to bring the public's full power to bear if he doesn't cut it out immediately, he will not dare touch you. If you're not unionized, then at least you now realize why that's important regardless of whether you get enough pay/benefits.
  • An alternative to proper confronation is the sick-out: On election day (is it a single day?), be sick, asleep, at home. Go to the doctor that day and get a note, or a prescription or something, which you could show him if he claims you're lying. An even better alternative to the sick-out is getting called away on some fabricated emergency.
  • If you are willing to confront him, but are just worried about the reprecussions, then - I would say that you should present as big a stick as possible. That is, if you have a "I won't do it" talk with him - try to have it in front of his other students; tell him he's breaking IEEE and university bylawys (having taken the trouble to figure out what these are, so you can cite exact articles to him), and if at this point he does not retract his demand, tell him if he insists you will publish an open letter to the IEEE, to his collaborators, to the dean of the faculty, to the president of the university and to the press, and will consider making a formal disciplinary complaint in the university and within the IEEE. He might not like you, but it should scare him enough. Oh, by the way, this is another conversation worth recording.

  • Another option regarding power relations. Are there any senior faculty members, preferably not friends or even acquaintances of his, with which you are on a friendly basis? If so, consider consulting them.

Note again that the above are suggestions to consider rather than out-and-out recommendations.

Finally, and not as a method of avoiding this specific issue - consider switching advisors or finding a co-advisor. This does not sound like a person I would want to be dependent on too much for my academic future. I realize switching advisors is often completely infeasible, but if it isn't, it might be worth it for ethical and psychological peace of mind. This doesn't address your immediate problem, though.

einpoklum
  • 39,047
  • 6
  • 75
  • 192
  • 4
    On a moral basis I agree with most of the answers. Just keep in mind that the advisor could be alerted to your plans by those whose participation you seek. – Daffy Punk May 30 '16 at 21:13
  • 3
    "... get him to talk about it while you record him on your cell phone..." This thought also crossed my mind, BUT this is illegal in about one-quarter of the United States. Make very sure you're in a "one-party consent state" before doing this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States – Daniel R. Collins May 31 '16 at 03:32
  • 8
    I think I disagree that the OP's moral obligation to the IEEE ought to be put ahead of his academic well-being. Forcing someone else to vote for your candidate in an election is ridiculously unethical. Not taking dire measures to avoid being forced to vote for a certain candidate is not nearly as unethical. The IEEE has more than 400,000 members. Professor Ridiculous's ploy to get his 30 students to vote for his candidate is....ridiculous, because it's 100% unethical and 0.00...% percent effective. – Pete L. Clark May 31 '16 at 04:36
  • 5
    Trying to mount some kind of sting campaign on your thesis advisor while he's your thesis advisor makes about as much sense as identifying the bridge you're on as structurally unsound and burning it while you're still on it. I 100% agree that the OP should make plans to switch to a more sane advisor and after doing that he should blow the whistle on this guy. But please don't advise him to jeopardize his entire academic career over a piece of micro-skullduggery. – Pete L. Clark May 31 '16 at 04:39
  • @PeteL.Clark agree. He has to dodge the bullet first, then to come back with a tank :p – Gautier C May 31 '16 at 06:26
  • 2
    @PeteL.Clark: With due respect, I believe if OP followed your advice, then what would happen is that he would just cave in to the pressure and move on, leaving an unchallenged public hazard as a staff member and thesis adviser to entrap others. And I'm sure it's not just about the IEEE elections, there must be other, even more significant examples of that kind of behavior. I also don't agree with your metaphorical summary of my argument. – einpoklum May 31 '16 at 07:45
  • I don't think it will be easy to consult other staff/supervisors. It places all but very senior staff in an impossible position. – Stilez Jun 01 '16 at 22:24
  • @Stilez: That is only true if they're spineless. Which, admittedly, is true for a great many people. – einpoklum Jun 01 '16 at 23:09
  • I wouldnt say "spineless" as if 90% of people are heroes. Academia can be very conservative (small c), very narrow-focused, is under considerable pressure internally and externally, and likes to avoid rocking the boat or washing dirty clothes publicly. Other staff could feel themselves in an impossible position since they should do something but -just like the OP - their practical options are limited by human nature, the politics of their institution, and their own need for security of employment. The question seems to call for a realistic assessment more than an idealistic one. – Stilez Jun 02 '16 at 00:04
  • 1
    @Stilez: Almost every person who has to work for a living is under considerable pressure internally and externally. Also, I specifically recommended OP approach faculty members who are at a greater 'political distance' to mitigate the effect of a close working relationship with that Professor. For such people, I do not accept the claim that acting in this case is some kind of heroism; it's the other way around: Failure to act in this case is depravity. – einpoklum Jun 02 '16 at 08:31
6

I would start by contacting the IEEE professional ethics team (or ask for the most senior director related to that area you can get through to). State when they ask who you want, "I'm not sure: it's a serious issue of professional ethics, I really need to speak to a director or someone that sort of level, or their PA, someone very senior, not an ordinary customer facing person or service staff."

You'll be asked your name/number - perhaps told they can't put you through without it. State that you want this on a "no names" basis, and please just find such a person and put me through. Be polite but firm, and expect a long time on hold, this won't be usual and they will have to check what to do and who to put you through to.

If the person is in fact senior, you can add that this is because you are fearful of repercussions. In my experience people will very easily agree to this - if not it's the wrong person. Getting put through to the right person is usually the hardest step, if needed Google and figure who you want to talk to (and direct phone?) and then be prepared to push hard. Example: "Something's happened which I need to discuss with the director responsible for ethics. Can you put me through please". Then "sorry, I need the director responsible for ethics. As you can understand, I don't feel the matter can be told to other people for passing on, or I'd have left it with the customer services team" followed by "can I speak with the manager in charge" or "please just find who I need to speak to and put me through". Be prepared for a few conversations like this, repeated escalation, and understand it's unusual for them, too.

A good trick is to ask for the person's PA, instead - PAs are usually very good for this sort of thing, and if you get to them, you can be more open, and they are easier to get to as well.

Eventually, assuming you get through to someone who sounds senior and willing to talk/listen, tell them the situation without names or institution/university details, and tell them you feel they should know but fear consequences, and this is far beyond what you are used to. You don't know whether or not the IEEE rules forbid or allow it even. But you feel ethically bound to report it. You don't however want to formally report it as you would have to provide names, dates, testimony, or proof (voice recording etc?). So you are in a quandary. Can he/she advise.

Then see what they say. They will surely want to know more, which you can't tell them, so ask them what else can be done. Can they consider it and call you back (friends phone) or email you (use a throwaway email address). That might be best.

In my experience directors etc often care passionately and want to hear if something's wrong enough to merit their attention - and forcing students' votes to manipulate the election almost certainly would be.

But if at all possible get proof.

You don't say what country you are in, and IEEE is worldwide. If legal in your country (and allowing for legal exceptions related to professional misconduct/coercion/abuse of position of power by professionals, as some countries consider this to be criminal misconduct not just "bad conduct"), you may also be legally allowed to take a voice recording app and a phone loosely held in the hand (just saying " 'bye" when he/she opens the door as if it's end of a call may also help) when you ask your supervisor is all it takes: "please, I'm not really sure it's okay to tell me who to vote for, in the IEEE, can you retract the direction, I feel very conflicted and stressed over it" or "would it be okay to vote privately"?, and try to capture them saying you have to do as told (if they do).

Stilez
  • 1,757
  • 7
  • 10
  • 5
    In many US states the advice in the last paragraph (to record the supervisor without his knowledge) would be illegal. – Tom Church May 30 '16 at 19:35
  • 5
    The OP, or future readers in similar positions, may not be in the United States. In many countries, it is entirely legal to record evidence of malfeasance/professional misconduct/public interest/possibly criminal conduct (coercion?blackmail? Abuse of position of power?). Don't assume everyone is subject to U.S. limits on this. IEEE.org/about: "420000 members in 160 countries" – Stilez May 30 '16 at 20:02
  • 3
    @Stilez, this forum has many participants who work in the US, so please don't assume anyone is not subject to US law. I'm glad you've added a warning that your recommended course of action is illegal in some places, and I urge you to be more proactive about including such warnings in the future. – Vectornaut May 30 '16 at 21:42
  • 4
    The first part of the answer (asking for someone "very senior") sounds at best like a salesperson and at worst like the action of a crackpot pushing fringe theories. If I were the receptionist, I would likely hang up on you. – March Ho May 30 '16 at 23:03
  • 2
    I've had to do this more than a few times in several decades, and it generally works very well indeed. People only rarely hang up (and almost never a second time), and I've got hold of board members of major companies and govt bodies this way. The important thing is, you must not be wasting their time - when you do get through, it has to be clearly justified. Otherwise forget it, you'll be passed on to someone else to handle it. In a very few cases executives make themselves inaccessible (grr,eBay) but only very few. In this case, a director of ethics isnt high profile and is often reachab – Stilez May 30 '16 at 23:20
  • 3
    @Vectornaut The U.S. isn't the only country in the world. This forum also has many participants who work in countries other than the U.S. It would be equally justified to: "please don't assume anyone is not subject to French law" or "please don't assume anyone is not subject to German law". – industry7 May 31 '16 at 15:22
  • 2
  • I did not presume that the OP was in the US (or in the particular states where this is illegal); I only pointed out that the advice might be considerably more risky than the answer indicated at the time.

  • regarding industry7's comment, I do think it would be reasonable to say "My advice is to do X; however, note that if you are in Germany or France, doing X may be illegal!"

  • – Tom Church May 31 '16 at 18:26
  • @industry7: Yes, that's what I'm trying to say! If you know or suspect there's a law anywhere in the world that prohibits your advised course of action, you should warn readers about it. – Vectornaut May 31 '16 at 21:05
  • Virtually everything is illegal somewhere... so wouldn't it be simpler for the reader to assume responsibility for knowing their own local laws? – industry7 Jun 08 '16 at 18:06