58

I teach mathematics at MSc and PhD levels. My preferred method of teaching is old-fashioned: talking and writing on the blackboard at the same time.

Why? Because it has many advantages:

  1. Handwriting: imposes few restrictions on notation and illustration. (Complicated figures I could project from my laptop, but I have no need for this in my courses.)
  2. Flexibility: whenever this is useful, it is easy to 'deviate from the script'.
  3. Natural speed: it imposes a natural speed on the speaker. Preparing slides using LaTeX or PowerPoint and just clicking through them, I find myself proceeding way too fast.
  4. Parallel displays: having several boards available for writing makes it easy to keep some text/examples on display on one board, while writing on another.
  5. Dynamics: referring to information on the different boards allows me to move through the room, adding a more dynamic aspect to the lecture.
  6. Ease: it is a low-tech way of achieving all these things simultaneously with easily available means.

The main disadvantage of this method is that I spend a significant amount of time of each lecture with my back to the audience.

Question: What would you recommend as a means of communication that combines the six features above (most importantly, the handwriting and parallel displays), but facing the audience?

Obviously, a low-budget solution would be appreciated, but my institute is usually pretty generous in investing in technology that improves teaching, so don't let that restrict you!

What I tried: Many things, including writing by hand on tablets (iPads, Digital Paper, reMarkable, etc.) and projecting this in the classroom. Perhaps I haven't found the optimal device for this yet, but it often comes out pixellated, delayed, and less readable than my usual handwriting on paper or the blackboard. Using a document camera to project my handwriting on paper works well, but can project only about half an A4 paper at a time to keep it readable for people in the back of the room and, like other approaches, has the disadvantage of not having parallel displays: it's hugely important to be able to keep definitions, examples, theorems from earlier on for easy reference.

Mark
  • 601
  • 1
  • 7
  • 8
  • 5
  • 2
    This thread should be thought-provoking, https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689 – Alecos Papadopoulos Mar 20 '19 at 19:15
  • Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point -- EWD1305 – Tobia Tesan Mar 20 '19 at 21:38
  • 3
    What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well. – Polygnome Mar 21 '19 at 00:19
  • In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. – David Mar 21 '19 at 03:05
  • 2
    @TobiaTesan I think the technology is just now (well, the 3 years ago as I was leaving school) coming into its own. I had a professor who wrote pages under a very sharp document cam, but then pressed a button to save the picture and keep it on one display while moving on to the next page. Multiply by 4 displays and you are on par with the big sliding blackboards of old, with the benefit of saving the notes for later upload (and not having to wipe old chalk off everything). – mbrig Mar 21 '19 at 04:19
  • 8
    It seems like most of the answers are simply challenging OP's assumptions and requirements; I am tempted to downvote them all. – Federico Poloni Mar 21 '19 at 07:37
  • I think there is a big difference between the resolution and writing clarity of the most recent technology than compared to a few years ago. I haven't tried it out myself but I've heard e.g. that the most recent iPad pro with the apple pen delivers a hugely improved writing experience. Combine that with higher resolution projectors and it might be worth trying the approach you have tried before but with the most recent technology. (I use chalk and blackboard myself but I'm curious to try out going the tablet route mostly to have a written record of the notes for the students.) – user2705196 Mar 21 '19 at 14:24
  • 1
    @FedericoPoloni … because? It seems not only valid but in fact desirable (because it’s helpful) to challenge OP’s assumptions if they are incorrect. That said, you can of course disagree with specific points in answers (and downvote for that reason). – Konrad Rudolph Mar 21 '19 at 15:25
  • @KonradRudolph We've had this discussion in Meta before – Federico Poloni Mar 21 '19 at 16:16
  • @FedericoPoloni Hm. I think this scenario is different, rendering the discussion irrelevant for this question. Otherwise, by your own words, we should be putting the current question on hold. And I don’t think there’s a case for that. – Konrad Rudolph Mar 21 '19 at 17:10
  • 1
    @user2705196 It's not only a matter of resolution, it's a matter of size. For some of the proofs I present in my lecture (in theoretical CS), I need three or four movable blackboards, preferably simultaneously. The area that is available for projection in my lecture halls is typically much smaller. – Uwe Mar 21 '19 at 17:34
  • @KonradRudolph The problem with the other question is that the set-up was not clear, and it was mixed with OP's personal story. I think that this question is clear enough: "these are six properties I want, what teaching support can I use to have them?". If you are not answering this question, what you have is a long comment and not an answer. – Federico Poloni Mar 21 '19 at 17:50
  • 1
    @FedericoPoloni They are answers. But pointing out that somebody has an X–Y problem can be necessary for a potential solution. – Konrad Rudolph Mar 21 '19 at 20:53
  • Whatever else you do, get yourself a small microphone. When you're talking and facing the blackboard, it's hard to hear what you're saying. – Galastel supports GoFundMonica Mar 22 '19 at 23:27

12 Answers12

52
  1. Do not assume that facing the audience is actually better. It depends on the type of content. For example, if you are explaining a diagram (detailed hydraulic system for instance), you want the audience to concentrate on that, not the presenter. The audience is still getting plenty of stimulation by having a live human voice along with visual content. You actually don't want the presenter to distract the eyeballs from the intricate content. (I see this wrong often with recorded talks where the video operator concentrates on the podium versus the charts, or shows both but with inadequate scale to see the slide charts.) If you are doing math (as opposed to history or literature), the content is more intricate and you should have the audience concentrating on the formulas, not the speaker.

  2. Take some occasional time to address the class when that is appropriate. Examples are a "sea story" about test performance or industrial application of the math. But these will be a minor amount of time within a math lecture.

  3. I mean, if you really wanted to, you could write backwards in grease pencil on plexiglass like in an old Navy combat information center. But really what is the point. People concentrate on the status (content), not the writer anyways. The one advantage is that you don't have a body blocking part of the board. I believe there are now electronic versions that would flip this around for you (or you can use an OHP). But still I think you lose a lot from having a lot less screen space than board space (especially with sliding boards). So, the small advantage of facing is at the loss of huge amounts of content physical space.

guest
  • 449
  • 3
  • 3
  • 8
    I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver... – Mark Mar 20 '19 at 07:57
  • 9
    @Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural. – Captain Emacs Mar 20 '19 at 08:05
  • Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways. – guest Mar 20 '19 at 08:07
  • 5
    w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room. – Chris H Mar 20 '19 at 09:47
  • 1
    @Mark rearview glasses would suffice for that purpose – Christopher King Mar 20 '19 at 12:18
  • 5
    @PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now. – Mark Mar 20 '19 at 12:20
  • 1
    @Mark I wear a mirror on my left wrist when biking. Visiting a bicycle store will yield many possibilities. – emory Mar 20 '19 at 18:19
  • 5
    I think your point 1 is simply wrong. Facing the audience is definitely better, for the simple reason that it makes your speech vastly more intelligible. This should be entirely uncontroversial: Everybody who’s ever attended a lecture knows that the way the speaker faces greatly impacts the ease of listening. – Konrad Rudolph Mar 21 '19 at 15:27
23

There is an extremely simple solution to this, which is that you stand sideways, with the students on your left and the board on the right. When you turn your head to the left, you're looking at your students. When you write, your body isn't blocking the board, or is at most only temporarily and partially blocking it. When you pause to explain something or ask for questions, you can turn your whole body toward the class and step a little to the side so that everyone has a clear view.

It's not particularly difficult to write in the sideways stance, and it doesn't even really take any practice. When I call students to the board to present their work, I just briefly demonstrate it to them, and they generally can do it immediately.

  • 3
    This would be my answer exactly. I am just linking a stock photo in case people are having difficulty visualizing it: https://www.123rf.com/photo_21149265_portrait-of-a-young-man-writing-on-chalkboard.html – Opal E Mar 21 '19 at 18:22
12

The retro-projectors where one wrote on the plastic film allowed one to go "back in time" as it were... rewind...

Of course one could lay a diagram on top then remove it etc

So, you can have a single slide with a particular expression or theorem that you need often and drop it on as necessary.

One comment mentions a "camera" to project a document - one that was used to do this is called an epidiascope...

Solar Mike
  • 28,097
  • 7
  • 60
  • 100
  • 24
    Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film. – Captain Emacs Mar 20 '19 at 07:58
  • 5
    There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full. – mlk Mar 20 '19 at 08:16
  • 2
    Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line. – mlk Mar 20 '19 at 08:22
  • 6
    @CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly... – Solar Mike Mar 20 '19 at 09:12
  • 1
    These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately. – David Tonhofer Mar 20 '19 at 09:48
  • Some of my schoolteachers used these, and those that did used them effectively. Some of my undergrad lecturers used them, but most used them badly. In a lecture situation they seem to work better if there's a 2nd projector for any pre-prepared slides, which are used judiciously. – Chris H Mar 20 '19 at 09:49
  • 1
    @DavidTonhofer scroll OHPs were much better with "permanent", i.e. alcohol-based, pens than water-based. – Chris H Mar 20 '19 at 09:50
  • @SolarMike "Scrolls do not confuse people, Profs confuse people." - of course, but, after all, there are media that invite bad use more easily than others or require more discipline to not abuse it. Of course, you can give brilliant presentations with any medium. I remember a world-class scientist giving a 2.5 hours presentation, with no break, with only a handful of slides, the first appearing after 45 minutes - and an audience hanging on to every of his words with rapt attention. They can do it, but not everyone can or should try. – Captain Emacs Mar 20 '19 at 11:35
  • @CaptainEmacs One of my professors gave every lecture (2 hours and 12 lectures) for stress and structures with 3 whiteboard marker pens - no notes - us final year students were sweating.... – Solar Mike Mar 20 '19 at 12:15
  • @SolarMike From your description it is not clear: was this masterful or a disaster? – Captain Emacs Mar 20 '19 at 12:28
  • 1
    @CaptainEmacs He could do a master class, he was superb... Clarity of progression and ease of explanation does not make stress in 3d easy... – Solar Mike Mar 20 '19 at 12:29
  • 1
    I didn't know the word "epidiascope"...in my question under the heading "What I tried", I mentioned projecting my handwriting on paper using a document camera. I suppose that is the modern-day equivalent. – Mark Mar 20 '19 at 14:27
7

This answer is going to broaden the question asked to instead be, "How can I give the students a better experience, while still delivering content through speaking and hand-writing?"

I would suggest spending dramatically less time lecturing in class. Instead, record the (majority of your) lectures electronically, and share them with your students online. You can use whatever setup you like -- writing on the board(s), writing on paper, writing on a tablet, writing on glass and having the image left-right reversed -- with one or more cameras recording your lectures. You can edit the footage as you like, to allow the parallel displays you enjoy for example.

This has several important benefits:

  1. Students can view your lectures at their own pace, at their own convenience, with the ability to pause, rewind, replay, and fast-forward.
  2. You can use class-time more effectively, by taking advantage of the circumstance of all these people in the same room. Have them talk to each other! They can work on exercises, or go through details of proofs, or work on more ambitious projects. Small groups are most effective, size 3 or 4.

Both of the above benefits are much more important than the ability to see your face during lectures.

vadim123
  • 4,192
  • 17
  • 22
  • That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures. – JeremyC Mar 20 '19 at 22:21
  • OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
  • – vadim123 Mar 20 '19 at 23:24
  • 3
    This is not a light change to the course though, because it assumes a lot more at-home study from the part of the students. I imagine that the load at OP's university is balanced on him actually explaining things in class, and not on him asking his students to study videos alone in advance. At the very least, a reduction in the number of total in-front hours would be expected. – Federico Poloni Mar 21 '19 at 17:53
  • @vadim OK I have been to 250+ graduate courses. Yes, you can set a quick task or two, but no real engagement is possible with individual learners. – JeremyC Mar 21 '19 at 22:35
  • +1 for recording lectures: makes life a lot easier if you can't attend classes sometimes. -1 for replacing regular lectures with that: it literally doubles the time students have to spend studying your subject, which is hardly something everyone can afford. Moreover, this means students can't ask questions, correct mistakes, etc. until the next in-person class, which can heavily hinder the understanding of a lecture (what if at t=10min you don't understand a result? so long for the rest of the lecture!) – seldon Mar 22 '19 at 10:01