4

Consider a case of a new researcher that does not know well all possible journals and has no access to human advice (from colleagues). (please do not comment that this is the best - out of scope of the question!)

Or one journal rejected the paper and the author is looking for outside the box candidates.


Possible examples:

1. E.g., in medicine, one can use this tool (ETBLAST) by submitting full text of the article http://etest.vbi.vt.edu/etblast3/

Some journals even require top 3 similar papers (found by ETBLAST) to be pasted into a form during submission (making sure authors well addressed related literature).

2. Or Elsevier JournalFinder service.http://journalfinder.elsevier.com/

userJT
  • 3,005
  • 2
  • 22
  • 30
  • 9
  • Read lots of papers. 2. Submit to journal containing the most articles you preferred.
  • –  May 31 '13 at 16:02
  • 13
  • Read your own bibliography. 2. Submit to the journal you cited most often. (Presumably you read lots of papers before you wrote yours.)
  • – JeffE Jun 02 '13 at 03:04
  • I don't fully agree with the above comments. I tend to cite lots of high impact journals but it doesn't imply that my work is that ground-breaking to be accepted by those. Better to be realistic and choose some less prestigious journal for a start. – Rabbit Aug 06 '13 at 20:32
  • 1
    Not applicable to your current situation, but note that it is often a good idea to decide the journal in advance. This allows you to structure the text as is usual in their articles and additionally stress some points that they seem to value in the text. This is particularly relevant for special issues. – Marc Claesen Mar 07 '14 at 09:34
  • 3
    I just tried Elsevier's tool, out of curiosity, and it returned "Journal of Archaelogical Science" and "Archives of Geriatrics and Gerontology" as two of the top five journals to submit an article about theoretical syntax. The moral of the story: check those suggestions with an actual human being that knows the field. – Koldito Mar 07 '14 at 11:19