61

I used to work in academia. I was lucky enough to publish important papers in peer reviewed journals that now regularly get cited by other papers in peer reviewed journals. I have left academia to work in the private sector, so every time I get a notification that my work has been cited elsewhere in a non open access journal, I can't even see how it was used. I should be able to ensure my work isn't mis-quoted or wrongly interpreted, but I can't without paying extensive fees for each and every article...

Is sci-hub my only non-option because I refuse to use illegal means?

einpoklum
  • 39,047
  • 6
  • 75
  • 192
tistbajean
  • 649
  • 5
  • 6

6 Answers6

109

You can write an e-mail to the authors and ask for a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send you one.

Before doing that, check if the paper is already published on their webpage, or if they have submitted it to a preprint server. Use of preprint servers and embargo periods vary among the various disciplines --- in some fields you are more likely to find it online earlier, in others it's almost impossible.

Federico Poloni
  • 46,039
  • 18
  • 129
  • 194
  • That seems to me like a sensible alternative I hadn't considered. Thank you. – tistbajean Dec 13 '17 at 18:24
  • 21
    @tistbajean One particular caveat for you, since you refuse to use illegal means: although a researcher may upload a paper to their website or send it to you, this doesn't mean that it's necessarily legal. I'm delighted to share my publications with anyone who asks, but I have no idea, in general, whether I'm legally allowed to do it. – Pont Dec 14 '17 at 08:22
  • 5
    @Pont Good point, but all publication copyright transfer agreements that I have seen explicitly allow private redistribution (at least as long as it's not automated). – Federico Poloni Dec 14 '17 at 11:11
  • 1
    I confess I don't read the T&Cs in detail, but I do know that on publication Elsevier send me a "personalized URL providing 50 days' free access", which generously allows me to read my own article and share it with others -- for 50 days. From this I always assumed that they don't grant me a general right to email my article to others in perpetuity. Either way, the upshot for @tistbajean would appear to be: make sure any file on an author's website is legal, and if not email them to request the identical file (if they're permitted to redistribute it by email) in order to stay within the law. – Pont Dec 14 '17 at 12:30
  • 5
    @Pont https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/sharing : "If you are an author, you may also share your Published Journal Article privately with known students or colleagues for their personal use", and "Authors can share their accepted manuscript [...] via their non-commercial personal homepage or blog". – Federico Poloni Dec 14 '17 at 12:44
  • It appears from Elsevier's text that sharing of the published article is restricted to "known students or colleagues" (i.e. I shouldn't email it to a stranger who requests it) and sharing via web is restricted to the accepted manuscript (i.e. not the final published form). In this context the "personalized URL" makes sense -- it's an additional avenue which lets me share the published article with unknown people, albeit only for 50 days. This is relevant to @tistbajean since (from comments) they seem to start article-hunting in response to citation alerts, so probably within 50 days. – Pont Dec 14 '17 at 13:00
  • @Pont: I would guess by "known" they just mean you are sharing it with people that you know specifically rather than making it available somewhere with a note like "for anyone who is interested". If a stranger contacts the author, the author would presumably "know" who the stranger is after the first contact. – sumelic Dec 16 '17 at 08:07
  • @sumelic Even if I "know" someone after they send me an email, that hardly makes them a "known colleague". At least to me, "colleague" implies someone I work with on some settled, regular basis. – Pont Dec 16 '17 at 08:47
40

Some options:

https://openaccessbutton.org/
http://unpaywall.org/
http://doai.io/

Also, Google Scholar will sometimes list mirror versions located elsewhere online.

That said, both with that and with contacting the author on whether you can access the article, you cannot be sure that the author has studied the publisher's terms and is allowed to share it, so it's quite hard to make sure you're not using illegal means.

Another option is to walk into an academic library and download them on their guest WiFi.

Vincent
  • 1,789
  • 1
  • 10
  • 13
  • 4
    While these options might seem dodgy, they are perfectly legal. Most funders now require that research is available in open access form, and to comply with this almost all journals will allow you to place an unformatted version of the manuscript on your personal website. These services find these copies. – Ian Sudbery Dec 14 '17 at 10:39
  • I owe you a beer. A lot. 2. This makes me wonder: is formatting the only difference between paywalled and unpaywalled documents? If yes, is that the only reason why pubishers fight e.g. SciHub but allow sites like these?...
  • – Neinstein Dec 16 '17 at 15:00
  • 1
    @Neinstein That depends on the publisher. Some allow you to incorporate the feedback from peer review, some even the formatting, some allow you to share them elsewhere directly and most only after an embargo periods of several months or years. See also https://medium.com/flockademic/how-open-can-open-access-be-cf6662565ecd – Vincent Dec 17 '17 at 14:52