I'm referring to his "typical" weight, as in how much he weighs during his day-to-day activities aboard the Enterprise (minus the pipe).
-
116The pipe lends gravitas, not gravity. – Valorum Aug 25 '19 at 06:43
-
16@Valorum: physics nerd nitpick: the pipe, having mass, lends both gravitas and gravity. – 0xdd Aug 26 '19 at 15:15
-
9@0xdd - Unless it has built-in anti-gravity plating. Which is perfectly possible in the world of Trek – Valorum Aug 26 '19 at 15:43
-
5@0xdd - Engineering pitpick: it doesn't add gravity (to all significant intents and purposes anyway), it adds weight. – AndyT Aug 27 '19 at 10:42
-
11@AndyT: Physics nitpick v2: Actually it adds mass, which results in an increased measure of weight in a gravitational field – Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 27 '19 at 11:57
-
Ceci n'est pas une pipe – Zack Apr 22 '21 at 19:15
3 Answers
Approximately 100 kg (= 220 lbs.) according to his 'mother'.
DATA: My -- childhood?
JULIANA: (laughing) That's what I called it. You were like a baby at first -- a hundred kilogram baby, but still...
This tallies with his official fact file on the StarTrek.com website, although this is likely a case of the tail (TNG: Inheritance) wagging the dog.
Bio-engineering Review: Joint Report of CMO Beverly Crusher, M.D. and Chief Engineer Geordi La Forge
Data, who weighs 100 kg., carries a concealed master on/off switch centered just below his right shoulder blade. This switch is known only to the senior staff of the Enterprise: commander, first officer, chief engineer, chief medical officer and ship's counselor.
Purely for reference, the pipe in question appears to be a Pioneer Pipe Co. "Calabash" pipe (with a replaceable cap gourd). They weigh approximately 82 grams.
-
@PatrickTrentin - Ah well, we see him with a whole pile of spare body parts in TNG: Datalore and we know he swapped bodies with a prototype Soong-type android in Nemesis. It's unlikely that these parts weigh dramatically more or less than his original parts. – Valorum Aug 25 '19 at 20:27
-
-
7@PatrickTrentin It's not specified by the sentence, but "You were like a baby" here doesn't have to mean "You looked like a baby". It could mean "You were unable to understand anything or do anything, like a baby". – Robyn Aug 26 '19 at 03:50
-
-
5I think the '100kg' remark was a generalisation just to illustrate that he was considerably heavier than a human baby. Much as we may say somthing heavy 'weighs a ton', its not to be taken literally. – Peter Ward Aug 26 '19 at 04:45
-
1@PeterWard - And while that's probably true (that it's a generalisation), the ST website says that it's exactly accurate. – Valorum Aug 26 '19 at 06:18
-
-
-
Although the error is in a direct quote, it's worth pointing out that commander and first-officer refer to the same person. I'm sure it should say captain there. – jpaugh May 31 '20 at 23:17
-
@jpaugh - Riker isn't the ship's commander, he's a commander in rank. Picard is the commander of the ship. – Valorum Jun 01 '20 at 06:34
-
Picard is the ship's captain, and also happens to be a captain in rank. I've never heard Star Trek mention a ship's commander, although I have heard that in other Sci-Fi (e.g. GalaxyQuest). I would agree with the phrase "commanding officer." But, otherwise it's just too confusing for any kind of reputable navy. – jpaugh Jun 01 '20 at 19:00
-
2@jpaugh - There are dozens of examples of this here. For example, from TNG Loud as a Whisper "*PICARD: This is Captain Jean Luc Picard, commander of the Federation starship USS Enterprise. If you continue to violate the cease fire, I will abort this mission.*" – Valorum Jun 01 '20 at 19:10
-
I'll expand on the point I think Don is making.
Humans are, on average, slightly less dense than freshwater; about 1-2% less. 997kg/m^3 vs 985.
Data not only sinks in freshwater, but he's dense enough to comfortably walk on the bottom (Insurrection). Since Data is the same volume as a human he must weigh more to be more dense.
At 180cm (Brent Spiner's height) a fit human male would be about 75 kg. An extra 2 kg, with no increase in volume, would be enough to make him just more dense than water. To be dense enough to comfortably walk on the bottom he'd need even more weight. How much more I can't say. An enterprising person could strap on weights and try replicating the scene from Insurrection.
100 kg would make Data about 33% more dense than water. That's likely plenty. The physics checks out there.
What about water leaking in and displacing air? In Insurrection we see him walk straight into the water, so he was already significantly more dense regardless of leaks. We don't see any bubbles which would be evidence of water displacing internal air pockets.
While in Descent it's mentioned he's not waterproof, there's evidence that was fixed. Data walks into the water non-nonchalant and there's no mention of ill-effect later in the film. Despite being cut off from a repair facility for Data, Picard seems completely at ease when Data submerges himself. And finally, Data demonstrates he's a flotation device; he wouldn't be a very good flotation device if he leaked.
UPDATE: Peter Cooper Jr. observed that in Insurrection we see Data both comfortably walking on the bottom of a lake and also acting as a flotation device bobbing halfway out of the water in that same lake.
At 100 kg, what does it take to do both?
At 180 cm (Brent Spiner's height) fit human is roughly 75-80 kg and about 80 L of volume. I'll use 80kg for round numbers. Data is the same build as a fit human, thus the same volume, but weighs 20 kg more. That makes him 25% more dense than a human. Humans are only slightly more dense than water. Data is significantly more dense.
In order to bob halfway out of the water, assuming there's no handwavium involved, Data must go from 25% more dense than water to about 50% less dense. He can do that by increasing volume or shedding "ballast". This ballast cannot be water as that would only take him towards neutral buoyancy. Indeed, we hear a balloon inflating implying he's increasing volume. Assuming it's full of some very diffuse gas such as helium, how big does that balloon have to be?
Data has to go from 1250 kg/m^3 to 500 kg/m^3. He needs to increase his volume by 150%. At 80 L this is an extra 120 L or almost a bathtub's worth of extra volume.
- 13,600
- 4
- 54
- 73
-
-
@Valorum Yes, though that might have changed by Insurrection. At the end I cover why waterproofing is not relevant given what we see in Insurrection. If water leaking in was significant he wouldn't walk straight into the water until fully submerged. He'd float and flounder a bit and slowly sink as water slowly leaked in. – Schwern Aug 26 '19 at 18:03
-
This assumes the water "leaked in" slowly. What if his bioplast skin is basically an open mesh when it comes to water? – Valorum Aug 26 '19 at 18:55
-
@Valorum Then he'd better not go out in the rain. Yes, for all we know he can dynamicly adjust his bouancy by replacing microscopic air pockets with water, but there's no canon for that. – Schwern Aug 26 '19 at 22:40
-
Not being waterproof wouldn't cause floating unless his overall density fell below that of water. It would merely cause a stream of bubbles and then water damage to sensitive parts. – Separatrix Aug 27 '19 at 09:56
-
@Schwern He clearly has some method to dynamically adjust his buoyancy, given that in the event of a water landing, he's designed to function as a flotation device. He's shown both walking on the bottom and floating, depending on what he wants to do. – Aug 27 '19 at 14:45
-
@PeterCooperJr. I don't know that we should rely on emotionally unstable Data's jokes. When do we see him floating? – Schwern Aug 27 '19 at 17:57
-
@Separatrix No bubbles when he enters the water in Insurrection is a good point. If he's taking on water and displacing air quickly we should see some froth. Also I suspect they fixed the waterproofing problem mentioned in the series as he walks into water non-nonchalant and has no ill effect for the rest of the film. – Schwern Aug 27 '19 at 17:58
-
2@Schwern: I thought that when he says he's a flotation device in Insurrection that he's floating in the water, though it has been a while since I've seen it so I may be misremembering. – Aug 27 '19 at 18:10
-
@PeterCooperJr. You're right! https://youtu.be/SWHcTnTF8Oc I thought it was a gag from Generations when they're about to crash and Data is drunk on emotions. – Schwern Aug 28 '19 at 01:25
-
The problem with shedding ballast is that getting retrofitted with it would increase his density, and he could never go lower than his original density without ballast. He could potentially increase his internal volume somewhat, with very clever placement of air bladders, to fill every nook and cranny. – jpaugh May 31 '20 at 23:22
Given Data's size and a density that causes him to immediately sink he must be significantly north of 100 kilos.
- 45
- 1
-
7This is an interesting point, but a bit thin for an answer. Can you come up with a number for what his weight would be if he were a human, as a point of comparison? This would also be better if you could provide a reference for a scene or scenes where he sinks. – DavidW Aug 26 '19 at 01:34
-
2Interestingly, the only way he could sink and still weigh 100kg would be if he's not watertight. Which seems unlikely. – ApproachingDarknessFish Aug 26 '19 at 04:02
-
7@ApproachingDarknessFish - In "Descent, Part 2" (TNG 7x01), Geordi and Data talk about Data's unsuccessful attempt at swimming in Devala Lake: "It took almost two weeks to get the water out of [Data's] servos." – Gaultheria Aug 26 '19 at 04:41
-
11Human beings as they are just barely float. He wouldn't have to be a whole lot denser that a typical person to sink. – whatsisname Aug 26 '19 at 04:41
-
@Gaultheria Well there you have it! Density doesn't enter into the matter. – ApproachingDarknessFish Aug 26 '19 at 05:07
-
13Add to that the fact that Data can, without being troubled in any way, hold an anvil weighting approx. 50 kilograms with his arm stretched out. Which, apart from his (obviously present) super strength, requires significant weight in order not to topple, regardless of how strong his arms may be. – Damon Aug 26 '19 at 08:07
-
2Humans float (barely) due to a combination of body fat and the air in the lungs. Neither of which Data has. @Damon unless he was standing directly 90deg upright, center of gravity would help a fair bit with not toppling, plus I'm fairly sure he can magnetise his feet? – RozzA Aug 26 '19 at 09:18
-
1@RozzA Maybe he can magnetize his feet and maybe he can't, but I'm pretty sure he was standing on rocks and/or dirt when he did that, not a ferrous metal deck, so that wouldn't have helped. – Darrel Hoffman Aug 26 '19 at 17:38
-
1Data isn't holding the anvil with his arm stretched out at 90 degrees https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v5O8KtAMg0 For comparison, here's some humans lifting a 56kg weight one handed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6keth64mRU – armb Aug 27 '19 at 14:58
-
I stand corrected, it was a wooden floor, possibly with carpet. Still not ferrous metal though, so we can rule out magnetism. – Darrel Hoffman Aug 29 '19 at 01:40


