13

In the original trilogy, the Empire Officers are mostly older men.

Galactic Empire Commanders

However, as we see in The Force Awakens, most of the officers are much younger. General Hux, First Order Officer

Does this have to do with casting, or does the First Order have some reason for all of younger people in high positions?

Josh B.
  • 1,784
  • 1
  • 16
  • 30
  • 18
    It's an all-new, hip, younger Disney Princess Empire. – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 21:54
  • 1
    @ DVK I was afraid of that. – Josh B. Jan 03 '16 at 21:57
  • 6
    @JoshB. : These actors will still be around for Episode XXV. – Praxis Jan 03 '16 at 21:58
  • 9
    I will sacrifice myself and do the the Godwin: The Nazis preferred young people in leading positions (per their ideology, in practice this did not always work out) because they were more malleable and did have less preconceived notions (i.e. they were more likely to cling to Nazi ideology because they did not know much else). It would make sense that the First Order (another iteration of an "evil empire) operates on similar principles. – Eike Pierstorff Jan 03 '16 at 22:05
  • 5
    I'm gonna go with "because it fits their key demographic". Excluding the muppet actors and a couple of people who were thrown in to make older fans happy, the average age of everyone in the whole.damn.film is 27. – Valorum Jan 03 '16 at 22:17
  • @EikePierstorff - was it really just ideological, or was that also because all the older people were the same old farts who lost the WWI and clearly weren't competent? – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:19
  • 2
    @Richard - in all fairness - how old were Hamill, Fisher, Ford, Wedge and Biggs in ANH? :) – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:21
  • @Richard - BTW, I got bupkis for anything canonically useful. So hopefully you can get a better answer cobbled together since I'm wholly dissatisfied with mine. – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:22
  • @DVK, well, their top fart had helped to lose that war.... but these are not really different things, "youth shall lead youth" was part of the ideology precisely because the older generation was viewed as incompetent and obsolete. – Eike Pierstorff Jan 03 '16 at 22:23
  • 1
    @DVK - That's true, but Vader, Tarkin and Obi-wan had far bigger parts than Han (10 mins of screentime), Leia (4 minutes of screentime) and Luke (45 seconds of screentime, not including his very...slow.........turning..........around). – Valorum Jan 03 '16 at 22:24
  • @EikePierstorff - " their top fart had helped to lose that war" - wasn't he a noncom? That doesn't count, only the offiers were to blame :) – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:32
  • 6
    I just looked it up, Michael Pennington was 40 when he played Moff Jerjerrod (I don't think an age is given in-universe). While this is indeed older than Domhnall's 32 I don't think "older men" is entirely fair (40 is pretty young when you among the 20 top officials in an galactic government). – Eike Pierstorff Jan 03 '16 at 22:37
  • 7
    For comparison: James M Gavin commanded the US 82nd Airborne Division in WW2 aged 37, while the splendidly named Galusha Pennypacker was a Union brigadier general in the US civil war, aged 20. Young generals do exist. – Royal Canadian Bandit Jan 03 '16 at 23:09
  • Do you have more examples of young commanders beside the one picture? After reading your question, I'm not convinced that the premise is actually true. – DCShannon Jul 21 '16 at 02:21

3 Answers3

14

First of all, let's dispense with the uber-obvious out-of-universe reason: Darth Mickey and their commercial strategy (including target demographics); and skip straight to the interesting in-universe stuff.

I would also like to point out that other top-flight commanders aren't always old: from out-of-universe Alexander the Great and his Companions; to in-universe, just-starting-Empire's 25 year old newly minted Darth Vader and reasonably young Tarkin.


It's hard to say "why" in general - other than my general impression from bits and pieces is that First Order isn't all that huge[1] so the human resource pickings may be slimmish - BUT:

  • General Hux: According to Visual Dictionary (p.40), it seems that he got his position so young due to good old nepotism. His Daddy was a "highly placed official in the Imperial Academy... on Arkanis" (later in the same page it said the father was the "Academy commandant", and Hux's views and theories are extension of his fathers' training principles), so he got the job.

    I seriously doubt that he qualifies on merits based on the details about him revealed so far (he thinks realistic simulations are enough for training - VD says "Hux's experiences in warfare are entirely theoretical". Don't see how that'd cause any issues). It's explicitly noted Kylo Ren has no respect for him "as a warrior".

    You KNOW you ain't a great warlord when your harshest critic is an emotionally unstable perpertual teen who has his own backside kicked by a 19-year-old nobody scavenger from Bupkis, DesertPlanet (even if she has the genes and the Force - so did you, Kylo!)

  • Kylo Ren: he was the only Skywalker of an appropriate age available around with Daddy Issues, ready to be turned to the Dark Side. Beggars can't be choosers, so Emo Teen got the gig.

  • Captain Phasma: so far, no clear details have been revealed about her past to indicate what her path to power was. I'm not even sure of her in-universe age, although the actress is youngish looking.

  • Supreme Leader Snoke: He told Kylo Ren that he witnessed Galactic Empire Rise - which was 50+ years ago, so he's much older than that.


One more relevant piece of info that may explain this: several times in canon it's described how First Order is meaningfully different from Empire ideologically. E.g. they care about their TIE pilots. They make military hardware based on performance, not bureaucratic BS (both these facts are from Incredible Cross-Sections pages on TIEs).

Basically, to me, First Order sounds like a small, nimble, disruptive Silicon Valley startup.

As such, it's quite possible - though not yet shown in any canon - that Snoke chose to NOT include any old fogeys from the Empire, and do the startup thing with young and vigorous leaders. Wiping the slate fresh, so to speak. This is just a guess and may very well be wrong.


However, please remember that we have very little in-depth knowledge about 30ABY Galaxy far far away. (Just like ANH only showed us very little about either the Galaxy or the Empire, if you recall what we saw: 1 neutral Rim planet; Alderaan, 1 Rebel moon, 1 DeathStar, 1 mention of Galactic Senate and Sector Governors and that the Emperor exists).

For example, we don't know what happened to Admiral Rae Sloane, and her mysterious Admiral-Thrawn-like superior who showed up at the end of "Aftermath" novel. I can't possibly believe Disney/LSG released that without any intent to tie it into upcoming films.


[1] First Order isn't all that huge - proof.

We can guess at that from the novelization scene, where Hux asks Snoke to wait a couple of hours to pinpoint D'Quar to destroy it - as opposed to right-away destroying the whole Ileeesium system the planet's in. His reasoning: after destroying Hosnian System, First Order would benefit from including the rest of Ileesium's planets.

Hux was clearly gratified to be the bearer of good news. “We were able to track their reconnaissance ship back to the Ileenium system. We are coordinating with our own reconnaissance craft in the area in order to lock down the specific location of their base.”
Snoke replied with cold satisfaction. “We do not need it. Prepare the weapon. Destroy their system.”
Collected and composed as he was, Hux was not immune to surprise. “The system? Supreme Leader, according to the most recent galographics, at least two and possibly three habitable worlds circle Ileenium. Following the destruction of the Hosnian worlds, would it not be worthwhile simply to destroy their base and claim the remainder for the Order? We will have the location of the base within a matter of hours and—”

What??? Old Galactic Empire consisted of millions of planets. Debating the need for a couple of planets of 1 system is... rounding error of rounding error to them. They blew up Alderaan just for a demo. This clearly shows First Order is small and in need of resources.

DVK-on-Ahch-To
  • 342,451
  • 162
  • 1,520
  • 2,066
  • Don't forget they destroyed a whole system with habitable planets before. there COULD be a different reason there. From how aftermath and also the film depicts....the new empire seems to be built around efficiency. IS it efficient to destroy hossian? Yes the republic and its fleet gone. Is it efficient to destroy the other system? No. It is a small base that needs destruction and the rest of the worlds can be colonized with loyal people increasing ones possible storm trooper resources by 2-4+ planets. So that COULD be the reason there in reality – Thomas Jan 03 '16 at 22:28
  • 2
    @Thomas - That's precisely my point. To old Empire with millions of habitable planets, wasting the time discussing 2-3 is absolutely meaningless and stupid. The very fact that this discussion even took place shows me that First Order is magnitudes smaller and weaker than Empire – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:29
  • 1
    or they just try to be more efficient. As that was the point sloane pointed out during aftermath. That the empire was big,... but one thing it was not was efficient and that brought down its downfall from her pov – Thomas Jan 03 '16 at 22:45
  • @Thomas - That's a valid argument. Not enough to convince me, yet, but definitely worth considering. We definetly don't have enough details for coherent impression – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:50
  • Yepp we will see with future novels and films which is the true reason. Thus only put up in comment as a possibility to considerate. – Thomas Jan 03 '16 at 22:52
  • @Thomas - I wouldn't be surprised if you turn out right. :) – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 03 '16 at 22:53
  • This seems to teeter off the topic of generals and on to the first order as a whole. – AncientSwordRage Jan 04 '16 at 00:17
  • @AncientSwordRage - (1) It covers both and (2) unless I'm missing something, as far as now, those 3 are basically the entire First Order command. So the two topics are practically the same thing? – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 04 '16 at 00:27
  • @AncientSwordRage - more importantly, the points about FO explain the reason for generals - they are simply scraping the bottom of a (very small) barrell – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 04 '16 at 00:28
1

To put it simply, the First Order was firmed pretty recently. Most of the people who joined were raised by Imperials, so they most likely would be young.

Donatello Swansino
  • 19,758
  • 13
  • 95
  • 166
  • 1
    Some specific dates would help flesh this answer out a lot. Also a little support for "Most of the people who joined were raised by Imperials". – DCShannon Jul 21 '16 at 02:20
0

In addition to DVK-in-exile's excellent answer that focuses on some characters, there is a new more general answer from the recent novel Aftermath: Life Debt by Chuck Wendig.

The Shadow Council (which will certainly lead to the creation of the First Order) has big plans for children, basically taking people very young to make them brainwashed loyal soldiers. Brendol Hux, father of General Hux from The Force Awakens, is a member of the Council.

I can't find any quote from the book right now - I haven't read it myself yet. Anyway you can easily find many articles that mention this and reveal everything is in the book. Like this one, which I would use as a source (obviously the link contains major spoilers): http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/07/all-the-secrets-of-the-star-wars-galaxy-revealed-in-aftermath-life-debt/

Neow
  • 1,787
  • 1
  • 12
  • 23