15

According to the Book of Genesis, Noah saved his family and representatives of every animal from a flood by constructing a boat. So since all of humanity should be descended from Noah, does that mean everyone is Jewish?

HodofHod
  • 21,056
  • 5
  • 91
  • 156

2 Answers2

26

As David Perlman stated in his answer, Biblical Noah was not Jewish. Depending on how you define Judaism, the first "Jew", or rather, the first person to recognize the G-d that Jews worship as the Creator and Master of the universe, was Abraham.

If you are interested in nationality, it goes something like this: Noah and his children were the only survivors of the Biblical flood. This means that everyone alive today stems from them. Nationality, then, as outlined in Genesis, stems from them as well. Noah had three sons: Shem (or Sem in English), Ham, and Yefeth (or Japheth in English). See here for a more extensive, but pretty clear, treatment of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_Noah

Abraham was a 10th generation descendant from Noah through his son Shem. Jews and Muslims believe they are descended from Abraham via his sons Isaac and Yishmael, respectively. These are the only two groups (that I know of) that identify as Semites, and thus the reason "anti-semitism" has, since the 19th Century, been the name given to hatred of Jews, and the reason Muslims in the latter half of the 20th Century began to object to this term.

So, if you are not descended from Abraham, you are most likely not descended from Shem, but one of the other two sons. Traditionally, Europe is descended from Yefeth and Africa is descended from Ham, but some have viewed this as racist theory because Ham was cursed due to some impropriety that involved his embarrassing his father (Noah) and not treating him with proper respect.

But without getting into all of that, the short answer to your question, based on the additional comments you made to David Perlman's answer, is no, not everyone is Jewish. Only the Jews are Jewish, but we're all cousins.

It's kind of like if Johnson has three kids, and they each have kids, and 9 generations later there's a Johnson daughter who marries a Smith, and they have kids, not everyone who descended from Johnson is automatically a Smith just because one set of Johnson's great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren are Smiths.

Community
  • 1
Seth J
  • 41,606
  • 7
  • 85
  • 245
  • 3
    +1. I wonder where the chinese fits in. After all, we grow more numerous than the jews. Also Noah doesn't worship the same God as Abraham? Hmm.. Interesting. What about Adam. He worship a different God too. – user4951 Dec 24 '11 at 11:08
  • 2
    Jim, I'm not following you at all...? – Seth J Dec 25 '11 at 02:40
  • @JimThio Adam, Noah, and Avraham all worshiped the same G-d. That doesn't mean that they were all Jewish. – HodofHod Feb 24 '12 at 16:07
  • Ah I get it :) I forget whether I was in joking mode or not when I wrote that comment. – user4951 Feb 27 '12 at 05:33
  • see bava basra 58a tosafos s.v. "meztayen maarasa", from which it seems that avraham was technically not jewish. he was an "ivri", i.e. form "the other side of the river" (the jordan) (or the midrash: the opposite of the ideology of the whole world). no one is called "yehudi" until after yehuda. – moses Apr 04 '12 at 21:53
  • 1
    @moses, The question of what defines a "Jew" has been asked and answered elsewhere on this site, both philosophically and semantically. While this was earlier than most of those questions, I was trying to avoid that issue altogether and focus solely on the Asker's core question, which was basically, "If the Jews stemmed from Noah, did that make everyone in the family line (going backwards to Noah) Jewish, since Jews are a nation as well as a religion?" My answer attempted to focus on the development of (different) nationhood(s) from the family line of humanity stemming from Noah. Make sense? – Seth J May 25 '12 at 19:48
  • Great post SethJ – Qoheleth Sep 24 '12 at 22:27
  • It would be questionable if the children of Yishmael are true Semites being that Haggar was Egyptian. That would make the children Avraham had with her half Semite half Hamite. Same goes for the childeren of Ketura being that she was Haggar. – user6591 Nov 23 '14 at 22:39
  • 1
    It is not true though that if you are not descended from Abraham you are not descended from Shem as Shem had loads of other descendents, including all the 13 sons of Yoktan who were the original "Arabs" mentioned in the Tanach according to sources. (They lived around Yemen). – CashCow Nov 04 '15 at 16:42
  • 1
    @user6591 Shem's sons (e.g. Arpachshad) wouldn't have married their sisters so presumably they married Ham's or Japhet's daughters etc. so using your logic we are all "mixed" descendents – CashCow Nov 04 '15 at 16:44
  • @Cash Cow you raise a good point. But still I wonder if the intermingling of the family pools before the separation into distinct peoples plays as big of a role as the re-mingling of them. Someone else also pointed out a flaw in my logic by noting that by umos ha'olam, yichus goes after the father. – user6591 Nov 04 '15 at 16:57
  • @CashCow, that's a fair point, but it's a tangent to my main point that I only used to illustrate the point that there's a family tree and that Avraham is ten generations descendent from Noah, and that Jews later descend from him. – Seth J Nov 04 '15 at 21:05
17

Biblical Noah was not Jewish. The first Jew was Abraham. Abraham came along ten generations after Noah.

From a Jewish perspective all people are children of Noah. All children of a maternal descent of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are Jewish.

So no, not everyone is Jewish.

EDIT:

Thanks to Seth's comment I did a bit more research on the topic.

The question of who is a Jew is a halachic question. Halacha states (Even Haezer 44) that Jews are those men and women born to a Jewish mother. This is based on the Tamlud Kidushin 68b.

The keeping of halacha began with the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai. From that point on Jewish nationality became based on maternal descent.

However, the original question relates to the time of Noah, some four hundred years before the giving of the Torah. To generalize the question we could ask to whom was the Torah given? Who were the people who stood at Mount Sinai and were declared the people of Israel?

I could not find a halachic source for this, and the number of Midrashim that deal with this period seem to contradict one another. There must have been some criteria ... and this seems like a good question to post on it own ...

David Perlman
  • 1,602
  • 11
  • 17
  • Do you know who he was? Or it's unknown? –  Jun 27 '11 at 11:12
  • @Templar What does the term "Jewish" mean to you? – David Perlman Jun 27 '11 at 11:25
  • I think like nationality, you can be english, you can be chinese –  Jun 27 '11 at 11:30
  • 2
    @Templar Judiasm is unique in its being at the same time a nationality and a religion. If you you wish to delve deeper into this issue see paragraph 95 here: http://www.shechem.org/torah/kuzari/ . This is from the Kuzari (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuzari) – David Perlman Jun 27 '11 at 11:34
  • David, I'm going to note that maternal descent was not used until much, much later than Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. When it started is a source of debate that I won't get into, but, needless to say, Abraham was not female, so technically maternal descent did not begin with him, at least. May I suggest an edit either specifying when maternal descent began, or, alternatively, generalizing simply that "descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are Jewish" (if you want to stick with Abraham as the first "Jew" for purposes of your answer). – Seth J Nov 14 '11 at 16:45
  • @Seth, interesting comment, thanks. Also interesting is that all of Sarah's children are Jewish but not all of Avraham's. With Yitzchak and Rivka it was half for both. And for Yaakov and his wives it was all for both. I'm guessing now that maternal descent began with Matan Torah and until then it was paternal descent as with the sons of Yaakov. B"n I will try to look more into this and update my answer. Thanks again for your comment. – David Perlman Nov 14 '11 at 21:35
  • what is matan torah? And yes David it's pretty confusing. Abraham is jewish. Yet not all of his son is, in fact some would latter become israel's arch enemy (ismael?). Isaac is jewish, yet Esau is not, and his descendant is not. And then Jacob is jewish and so all his descendants. Looks like there isn't really any consistent rule isn't it? If abraham is not jewish and we started at Jacob/Israel, which is essentially you guys, then this issue would have been easily solved. – user4951 Feb 27 '12 at 05:36
  • Notice how the above answer puts "Jew" in quotation marks when referring to Abraham. http://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/16434/jewish-status-of-the-patriarchs-wives#comment35191_16434 – EEE May 24 '12 at 19:33
  • How do you figure Avraham was a jew? He neither lived in Judea nor was apart of the twelve tribes. By this logic Ishmael and Esau are jews. – Qoheleth Sep 24 '12 at 22:24
  • @Qoheleth good question -thx. See my edit. – David Perlman Sep 27 '12 at 14:52
  • Although Noah lived sometime after the flood, the year of the flood was 1656 and the Torah was given in 2448 so 792 years different, not 400 – CashCow Nov 04 '15 at 16:46